SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Berkshire Hathaway Class B
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1652 93 0 BRK.B
Emcee:  Patricia W. Harris Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1327 good post.The Duke of URL©-2/10/2000
1326 <i>I wonder if share repurchase will ever enter into the equation?</i&Al Chechatka-2/10/2000
1325 Duker, you said ><i>The valuations in today's market are ridiculouGottfried-2/10/2000
1324berkshirehathaway.com There's a section called interim reports, September 9Richard Forsythe-2/10/2000
1323 ZG, <i>So hopefully, it works this time.</i> I am highly confidenDuker-2/10/2000
1322 Duker, thanks for the linker. value investors are in the toilet for quite a whizyx1996-2/10/2000
1321 ZG, freeedgar.com I recommend downloading the RTF file (Rich Text Format). IDuker-2/9/2000
1320 Richard, ... and don't forget that little thing called float that seems toDuker-2/9/2000
1319 Richard, Thanks for the post. do you mind tell me where you got this data from?zyx1996-2/9/2000
1318 Lets face it. Anyone who bought brk since April of 97 has not make a penny in tzyx1996-2/9/2000
1317 Duker, no offense taken. :) I just had to pull your chain. G. [end]Gottfried-2/9/2000
1316 Exactly. Thanks for the summary but keep quiet .... I'm still buying. MarkeLeroyt-2/9/2000
1315 Just to drill down into the valuation aspects... At September 99, Berkshire haRichard Forsythe-2/9/2000
1314 G, Oops ... didn't mean to offend you! I have infinite faith in BerkshireDuker-2/9/2000
1313 Duker, you said ><i>Can we lay off the technical analysis?</i>&lGottfried-2/9/2000
1312 Mr. Duker, You said:"Now there is a thoughtful strategy. Let it make &quoDepyDog-2/9/2000
1311 Can we lay off the technical analysis? This is Berkshire Hathaway, not some inDuker-2/9/2000
1310 <i>just too much money to be made in techs to mess with Berky until it tuDuker-2/9/2000
1309 Seems like a good price to buy .Started at 1680,added a few more shares 1585 toJerry Gogol-2/9/2000
1308 i simply see continued great buying opportunity. companies like brk, service mahoyasaxa-2/9/2000
1307 It appears to me that my 1600 support approaching much fast then I expected. Iszyx1996-2/9/2000
1306 1500's next stop. I got out a ways back...just too much money to be made inDepyDog-2/8/2000
1305 Jacques: BRK is around 1.4 to 1.5X book right now. As for historically, we arBenkea-1/25/2000
1304 Benkea - "This is why BRK does and should trade at a multiple of book.&quoJacques Newey-1/25/2000
1303 Jacques: "Therefore I concluded that the understated value (oops I didn&#Benkea-1/24/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News