LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

An SI Board Since February 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2484	45	0	LUMM

Emcee: Currency	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1334	Can anyone verify what I was told? By not being listed on NASDQ, for whatever r	opalapril	-	12/28/1999
1333	jjs64, I would speculate that LUMM got the "E" because they have not	faro	-	12/28/1999
1332	Steve; Touchy aren't you? Buyers should beware, of all OTCBB POS reverse m	jjs64	-	12/28/1999
1331	I'm afraid Don has more patience than I with your rubbish. You sound like	Steve	-	12/28/1999
1330	Faro; The requirements for listing on the OTCBB are the most lenient that coul	jjs64	-	12/28/1999
1329	jjs64, I agree with you that the situation needs immedate attention. Yet I woul	faro	-	12/28/1999
1328	Where is your PROOF tout? Buyer Beware!	jjs64	-	12/28/1999
1327	<<I don't know.>> Faro, mon ami, I do know. LUMM won't go	Don Johnstone	-	12/28/1999
1326	Faro; Thanks for your note! I'm glad that someone, other than Linden and m	jjs64	-	12/28/1999
1325	jjs64 --- You are 100% right with your post 1320 Bonjour, LUMME -- you just g	faro	-	12/28/1999
1324	CC, I have been in touch with the company and the SEC realizes the predicament	Don Johnstone	-	12/27/1999
1323	Linden, my good fellow. Are you in cahoots with teach, otherwise known as jjs64	Don Johnstone	-	12/27/1999
1322	Hey teach The 'E' is a non-issue. I'm outa here! Good luck in th	Don Johnstone	-	12/27/1999
1321	Don, I'd like to understand your logic. Here are the facts as I understan	lindend	-	12/27/1999
1320	"Examined for Nasdaq...Flat out Wrong", GMAFB Oh boy, time for your	jjs64	-	12/27/1999
1319	<<jjs64 you seem a little hasty>> Hasty isn't the half of it.	Don Johnstone	-	12/27/1999
1318	<<goodbye OTCBB>> Hello NASDAQ-NMS! You weren't even close.	Don Johnstone	-	12/27/1999
1317	On 12/23 a whole pile of companies whose names begin with K-M (including LUMM)	Steve	-	12/27/1999
1316	My understanding is that the 'E' is becasue they are being Examined for	Lhn5	-	12/27/1999
1315	Should not be a surprise...LUMME is in the process of being delisted. The "	jjs64	-	12/27/1999
1314	LUMM Symbol was changed to LUMME Why?	c. carlson	-	12/27/1999
1313	Make that LUMME...	SecularBull	-	12/27/1999
1312	stock100.com	afrayem onigwecher	-	12/24/1999
1311	LUMM ...............34.592669. Current closing: 25.0. Volume: 219000. Five Day	afrayem onigwecher	-	12/22/1999
1310	ECCC was trading at 7 - 7 1/2 on the Bulletin Board before getting delisted. No	afrayem onigwecher	-	12/22/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):