SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Gary Dobry Subpoenas 41 SI Aliases
An SI Board Since January 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1136 63 0
Emcee:  Janice Shell Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
136That's how Pugs would like for it to be seen. <i>You are saying theJanice Shell-1/19/2002
135John-- Thank you for your incisive posts. I had wanted to express my outside oCurtis E. Bemis-1/19/2002
134Scion, it appears TopCat's "homework" reference was to the poster Jeffrey S. Mitchell-1/19/2002
133This really isn't an issue of discovery. We're not parties to the lawsuiSalemsHex-1/19/2002
132TC...I think you owe John an apology, and perhaps if you had done some checking scion-1/19/2002
131Impugned <b>or</b&gGraystone-1/19/2002
130John, you'll have to pardon my lack of knowledge on your post. My post was The Duke of URL©-1/19/2002
129If by homework, you mean some background on Gary Dobry, his lawyer, this subpeonSalemsHex-1/19/2002
128>>The purpose of discovery is to find issues. Normally the requestor does s martin-1/19/2002
127You are saying the subpoena is legally seen as part of the discovery process in John-1/19/2002
126At this juncture it might be auspicious to note that Ralph Nader did not win hisThe Duke of URL©-1/19/2002
125lol, a couple of these aliases don't even exist. The hell does Richter thinJanice Shell-1/19/2002
124That won't work... <i>or wait for a victory and sue him for maliciousJanice Shell-1/19/2002
123<<i>I didn't make the list either, Mo'rice. </i>> jMaurice Winn-1/19/2002
122Yes Janice, it is problematic on Gary's part. The subpoena if memory servesThe Duke of URL©-1/19/2002
121BUT the law prohibits the use of subpoenas as a means of doing initial discoveryJanice Shell-1/19/2002
120SI responds to a court ordered subpoena, they have no choice. If you disagree iThe Duke of URL©-1/19/2002
119What Dobry thinks of SI: 11/8/01 : Silicon Investor : CIA OPS or part of the BIJanice Shell-1/19/2002
118Mmm, wait a minute - if the actions of SI lead directly to harm on its members imarcos-1/19/2002
117The Carnival <b>or</b&gGraystone-1/19/2002
116Ah well, Jesse Jackson is also on Pugs' list as part of this overall Bigger-Bill Ulrich-1/19/2002
115<i>I wonder if SI would be liable for any damages that come to the membersThe Duke of URL©-1/19/2002
114Hello Bill <b>or</b&gGraystone-1/19/2002
113lol, physically Pugs has been compared by someone who's seen him to "thJanice Shell-1/19/2002
112It's amazing what a free gym membership can buy these days! "<i>Bill Ulrich-1/19/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):