SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
RAMTRONIAN's Cache Inn
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
14464 65 0
Emcee:  NightOwl Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
13839“<i>Electronic components isn’t exactly a ‘teflon’ market, but it does havNightOwl-2/19/2008
13838<i><b>Chinese New Year quiets IC market Converge reports The electrNightOwl-2/19/2008
13837We seem to be having two different conversations Sr K... As far as I can tell tNightOwl-2/18/2008
13836"it" = "an income tax benefit of $7.6 million"Sr K-2/18/2008
13835<i>"they ignored <b>it</b> and reported 7 cents pre-stockNightOwl-2/18/2008
13834they ignored it and reported 7 cents pre-stock and pre tax deferred assetSr K-2/18/2008
13833"<i>But in 2006 on a per share basis, if you back the options expenseNightOwl-2/18/2008
13832Sr K... I took your advice and when back to look at their 2008 guidance. This isNightOwl-2/18/2008
13831Sr K... Do I understand you correctly? "<i>Read the long-term guidanNightOwl-2/18/2008
13830Read the long-term guidance and GAAP requirements when it is "more likely tSr K-2/18/2008
13829I think they could get the $20M with less than $100M Mr. Caruthers. That assumedNightOwl-2/18/2008
13828And what should I be "thinking" before I posted it that would have ideNightOwl-2/18/2008
13827I don't think it's garbage. I think it's an intriguing observation.Tom Caruthers-2/18/2008
13826Why don't you think before you post such garbage?Sr K-2/18/2008
13825Based on: * the relative size of the Q4 receivable, up 0.5M sequentially and 2NightOwl-2/18/2008
13824<i>*** more likely than not, that RMTR will earn at least $7.3M in net opeNightOwl-2/17/2008
13823Well... I have googled my last tax reference. I am too old to learn tax accountiNightOwl-2/17/2008
13822<i>My recollection is that 3 or 4 years ago the accumulated NOL's of tNightOwl-2/17/2008
13821Why hello Mr. Masterson, <i>(1) I don't believe there was any implicaNightOwl-2/17/2008
13820(1) I don't believe there was any implication that they would be able to fulBret Masterson-2/16/2008
13819You know I mentioned that "Sonoluminescence to Crystal Fusion" articleNightOwl-2/16/2008
13818And this is why Friday's Vinh-flim-flammery was really all <b>your<NightOwl-2/16/2008
13817This is why no body at the SEC is ever allowed access to anyone at the UniversitNightOwl-2/16/2008
13816This is why I hate you so called... <i><b>optimists</b></i&NightOwl-2/16/2008
13815The first manned missions to Mars will be powered by <b><i>FRAM Ion NightOwl-2/16/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):