Martha Stewart -- Scourge or Scapegoat | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Martha Stewart -- Scourge or Scapegoat

An SI Board Since February 2003

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
165	12	0	MSO

Emcee: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
140	<i>She's the one that was arrogant enough to think that she could go t	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	3/9/2004
139	Read between the lines tippee.. Waskal was her friend. She may not have been tol	Stoctrash	-	3/9/2004
138	good post. thanks -- I see where you are coming from.	yard_man	-	3/9/2004
137	Hi tippet, <I>For me, I would not vote to convict unless I knew that she	EL KABONG!!!	-	3/9/2004
136	You point up something that IS consistent -- in human experience -- folks always	yard_man	-	3/9/2004
135	My favorite Martha story is when Martha found herself denying a story in the NY	Jeffrey S. Mitchell	-	3/9/2004
134	Hello tippet, <I>I couldn't disagree more ... if she is a crook for t	EL KABONG!!!	-	3/9/2004
133	no -- you are right -- I only read excerpts of the testimony and what the jurors	yard_man	-	3/9/2004
132	Martha Stewart was prosecuted for the same reason that Ken Star was appointed as	TigerPaw	-	3/9/2004
131	>>again -- the testimony didn't prove that to me -- I can and do have	Labrador	-	3/9/2004
130	I don't know that she knew why Waskal was selling -- if you claim to -- you	yard_man	-	3/9/2004
129	>>Actually, whether or not she knew exactly why the Waksal's were sell	yard_man	-	3/9/2004
128	again -- the testimony didn't prove that to me -- I can and do have an opini	yard_man	-	3/9/2004
127	>>if she did lie -- she lied about a non-crime.<< Lying to the gov&	Labrador	-	3/9/2004
126	Message 19894268	stockman_scott	-	3/9/2004
125	You make me sick tippe.... SHE WAS ON THE BOARD OF THE NYSE! Don't you think	Stoctrash	-	3/9/2004
124	When Silence Isn't Golden _____________________________ Martha Stewart'	stockman_scott	-	3/9/2004
123	After Stewart, Higher Stakes ______________________________ EDITORIAL The Los	stockman_scott	-	3/9/2004
122	Martha Stewart's Conviction Sends the Wrong Message By Allan Sloan The Was	stockman_scott	-	3/9/2004
121	Bush's Justice Department spent lots of time (and money) going after Martha	stockman_scott	-	3/9/2004
120	Hello tippet, <I>but did he interview the woman. Does he know her??</I	EL KABONG!!!	-	3/8/2004
119	it may very well be that he had tons of good second hand accounts Kerry, but did	yard_man	-	3/8/2004
118	tippet, Chris Byron wrote the book "Martha, Inc.", which later became	EL KABONG!!!	-	3/8/2004
117	If -- big if for me -- just because 12 jurors was convinced, doesn't give me	yard_man	-	3/8/2004
116	f'n silly!! The writer is clearly sitting in judgement of her inner motivat	yard_man	-	3/8/2004

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):