LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

An SI Board Since February 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2484	45	0	LUMM

Emcee: Currency	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1409	or, the lawyers can jump out of a helicopter, sans chute, while flying over Ind	Peter Sherman	-	1/13/2000
1408	ahh..my take slightly different - LUMM says to lawyers,... take this box of pap	Peter Sherman	-	1/13/2000
1407	LUMM gives "marching orders to lawyers"....get NMS. Lawyers hold hand	the Chief	-	1/13/2000
1406	aren't you guys blaming the messenger [ the lawyers ] - maybe the message i	Peter Sherman	-	1/13/2000
1405	<i>Was it a minor amendment, or a major one?</i> I suppose it real	the Chief	-	1/13/2000
1404	Chief: LUMM's problem? I tend to agree. Why? Simple, and it has to do w	John Curtis	-	1/13/2000
1403	Don't get the impression that I either donot like the technology or the com	the Chief	-	1/13/2000
1402	Does anyone know if just anyone can attend the OFC in March? Also, does anyone	Yankee Trader	-	1/12/2000
1401	Ok, let?s blame LUMM for trusting their lawyers. That?s LUMM?s fault. They scre	RCDTD	-	1/12/2000
1400	I agree , this is a big screw up. It reflects a lack of business experience to	jim heger	-	1/12/2000
1399	RC, Don, et al. NMS listing soon...Not likely! Did I not provide factual, doc	jjs64	-	1/12/2000
1398	The OTC BB requirements for reporting is far less than the requirement for NAS	the Chief	-	1/12/2000
1397	Well it is a SEC failure only to the extent that they are not able to handle th	marcos	-	1/12/2000
1396	Actually the SEC would not push LUMM to the pinks if it was their failure, nope	the Chief	-	1/12/2000
1395	Jefe, the SEC is way behind because of this push by the otc-bb to clean up the	marcos	-	1/12/2000
1394	Staying long. LoD	SecularBull	-	1/12/2000
1393	The PR release aside, is there any chance the SEC will approve LUMM's appli	opalapril	-	1/12/2000
1392	<i>There are no show stopping problems with the filing. This is a timing	the Chief	-	1/12/2000
1391	Just spoke with SL. Well, I guess they were a bit too optimistic. Their lawyers	RCDTD	-	1/12/2000
1390	That is, without a doubt, the poorest example of "management" that I	the Chief	-	1/12/2000
1389	RTQ: 22 1/4, down 6 3/4. The stay on the pinks will be short, no pun intended.	Glenn Petersen	-	1/12/2000
1388	Filing status update: biz.yahoo.com Wednesday January 12, 1:12 pm Eastern Tim	Glenn Petersen	-	1/12/2000
1387	LUMM going to pink sheets: The SEC hasn't had time to look at LUMM's	Don Johnstone	-	1/12/2000
1386	Hi Don, here is some movement in that sector again this morning and another com	Syl98	-	1/10/2000
1385	This posting from RB, which I found interesting and informative, is repeated he	Don Johnstone	-	1/9/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):