SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer
An SI Board Since May 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2121 25 0
Emcee:  davidk555 Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
1421<I>""As far as I know, not a single basher has even said whetherKirk ©10/7/2007
1420"As far as I know, not a single basher has even said whether he/she believeyaetmo10/7/2007
1419<i>...James" (who was in my opinion, was falsely accused by the Bob Bqueenleah10/6/2007
1418Octavian, The scope of what I am referring to goes quite beyond James. In faEQ 10/6/2007
1417To me, until we know whether James did or did not post copyrighted info from theoctavian10/6/2007
1416>> "A verdict was rendered yesterday in an interesting case of copyriEQ 10/6/2007
1415Ms. Queen...Yes someone has heard something "more directly from James"Honey_Bee10/6/2007
1414<I>It seems obvious to me that you are trying to cast doubt on the story tqueenleah10/6/2007
1413"<I>I'm afraid you're misinterpreting, yaetmo, and how is my Kirk ©10/6/2007
1412<i>--Who denied that Brinker cancelled James' subscription? "It&queenleah10/6/2007
1411--I don't quite understand your points. [Octavian} --Who denied that Brinkeyaetmo10/6/2007
1410queen said: <<No answers to Octavian's questions?>> --LOL. Thaoctavian10/6/2007
1409yaetmo said: <<At the time, you choose to not believe, not to see the evioctavian10/6/2007
1408No answers to Octavian's questions? Octavian to yaetmo: <i>--I donqueenleah10/6/2007
1407Hi everyone. I am back after a couple week absence. I see the board is bustlingdavidk55510/6/2007
1406<i>Queen, I think that it's a lot more fuzzy.</i> And some woulqueenleah10/6/2007
1405I doubt that anyone's mind is TOTALLY open, but we can at least try. I'Math Junkie10/6/2007
1404"<i>Have you forgotten all those times when a message that contained Math Junkie10/6/2007
1403Math, my mind is totally open, like your's is. There are some on both sideyaetmo10/6/2007
1402Then we shall agree to disagree.yaetmo10/6/2007
1401Octavian, Have you forgotten all those times when a message that contained &quoyaetmo10/6/2007
1400Queen, I think that it's a lot more fuzzy. First off, I would like to say tyaetmo10/6/2007
1399"<i>You've already closed you mind.</i>" And yours isMath Junkie10/6/2007
1398Sir A... You seem to be in denial about the character of your statement. It CERMath Junkie10/6/2007
1397yaetmo said: <<Octavian, over the years, you've chosen to ignore quitoctavian10/6/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):