Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy
Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

An SI Board Since July 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
14627	28	0	PMU

Emcee: James Cook	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
14302	reallt? i thought it was all the over burden? hmmmm Junes almost over.. wonder i	Natedog	-	6/28/2001
14301	"I think the problem with Diablillos is simply a matter of cost per ounce&q	DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck	-	6/28/2001
14300	Phil, to answer your question a receiver would take over and liquidate the asset	Natedog	-	6/27/2001
14299	Elizabeth, A silver producer may have better tech at it's disposal and be ab	Bill Jackson	-	6/27/2001
14298	I think the problem with Diablillos is simply a matter of cost per ounce. The &q	Elizabeth Andrews	-	6/27/2001
14297	Eliizabeth. This new blend of barrick and homestake, is homestake more involved	Bill Jackson	-	6/27/2001
14296	You really don't think they are going to give any money back do you? As of J	Elizabeth Andrews	-	6/27/2001
14295	No news releases and an e-mail address that bounces e-mails back! Does anyone k	Phil Jones	-	6/27/2001
14294	chared, <i>Luicho was a bust. Didn't you know? </i> That depen	teevee	-	6/25/2001
14293	Only too well!!! Phil	Phil Jones	-	6/25/2001
14292	Luicho was a bust. Didn't you know?	charred	-	6/25/2001
14291	I notice that e-mails to 'pacrim@direct.ca' are bouncing back with a mes	Phil Jones	-	6/25/2001
14290	Peruvian megafind?? I see no mention of new projects. I dont believe their spend	Natedog	-	6/21/2001
14289	I think you are partially correct. In Argentine, a fee equivalent to US$400 per	Elizabeth Andrews	-	6/21/2001
14288	Just to clarify. My understanding is that the landowner is the government, and	ltholder99	-	6/21/2001
14287	Thanks, Elizabeth. Your point that PFG might have obligations to the landowner	Phil Jones	-	6/21/2001
14286	thank you	Natedog	-	6/21/2001
14285	There is no deadline. Barrick has to spend US$4 million between June 2000 and Ju	Elizabeth Andrews	-	6/21/2001
14284	I dont see a 2001 following that deadline? anyway, im having a wicked day! So	Natedog	-	6/20/2001
14283	Nathanc, I can not find a "date" other than by "June." The	Ross Mickey	-	6/20/2001
14282	Nathan, So it was you, a penny tossed from on high does pass all the way through	Bill Jackson	-	6/20/2001
14281	Bill, it was jus a plain cape! It really is true about what they say about the p	Natedog	-	6/19/2001
14280	Nate, I recall someone was seen on the fcp in a batman suit, was that you? I ha	Bill Jackson	-	6/19/2001
14279	blah blah blah..back in the day...I do it for the rush Bill always have. yes, sh	Natedog	-	6/19/2001
14278	Nate, has been in a bar all week, as you can see he has forgotten everything abo	Bill Jackson	-	6/18/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):