Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker, Moneytalk and Marketimer

An SI Board Since May 2007

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
2121	25	0

Emcee: davidk555	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Posted
1471	kirk said: <<He also boldly stated on the radio that we were in a secular	octavian	10/8/2007
1470	joe fabitz, if you have something to say to me, you may say it publicly on the b	alleeox	10/8/2007
1469	joe fabitz, if you have something to say to me, you may say it publicly on the b	queenleah	10/8/2007
1468	"<< I suspect it was my less than flattering habit of pointing out ho	Math Junkie	10/8/2007
1467	"No, I don't remember the numbers. I tried to find math's post but	Math Junkie	10/8/2007
1466	Kirk...I believe you are right on all counts about what Dr. James actually wrote	Honey_Bee	10/8/2007
1465	No, Kirk, if you're going to use one of my words to revise and expand the di	queenleah	10/8/2007
1464	I believe Dr Jay's (James to those he is formal with) "transgression&qu	Kirk ©	10/8/2007
1463	No Queen, it is a continuing saga where something odd happens to those who post	Kirk ©	10/8/2007
1462	"Revenge" being legally canceling the subscription? LOL and Big Deal,	InvesTing	10/8/2007
1461	No, Kirk, your post is a bit revisionist and off-topic here. I was talking about	queenleah	10/8/2007
1460	Look, you are the one who made information up about Brinker, got caught then spu	Kirk ©	10/8/2007
1459	dija, I think we'll have to agree to disagree on that one. I just don't	queenleah	10/8/2007
1458	"<I>Revenge" being legally canceling the subscription? LOL and B	Kirk ©	10/8/2007
1457	Do you or math have figures to the contrary? Kirk "responded": <	octavian	10/8/2007
1456	Kirk said: <i>Anyone who talks about copyright nonsense is blowing smoke t	queenleah	10/8/2007
1455	<b>Kirk said:</b> You are Wrong on both accounts. What else is new a	EQ	10/8/2007
1454	Ms. Honeybeer <b>SAYS</b> that Dr. James <b>WROTE:</b>	EQ	10/8/2007
1453	"<I>I also seem to recall him stating in the newsletter many months a	Kirk ©	10/8/2007
1452	You are Wrong on both accounts. What else is new around here? It is simply ama	Kirk ©	10/8/2007
1451	<I>Do you or math have figures to the contrary? </i> Yes. You shou	Kirk ©	10/8/2007
1450	honey said: <<I especially like the following paragraph. It has been a ve	octavian	10/8/2007
1449	Queen, I interpreted James note to honey as a denial. Here, again, is what he sa	octavian	10/8/2007
1448	Seems to me you're interpreting James' words just as you wish to, Ms. Ho	queenleah	10/8/2007
1447	Ms queen...thank goodness readers can read what Dr. James actually said about th	Honey_Bee	10/7/2007

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):