SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Southwest Airlines (LUV))
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
299 19 0 LUV
Emcee:  regine Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
149 Well...I exited 2 weeks ago (approx.) at 27 1/4, as I didn't like the look Wallace Rivers-5/21/1997
148 I'm out at $27.5 today. Just doesn't look like it will go to $33 againRoger Zucchet-5/21/1997
147 Keep in my mind that airline stocks' price cycles statistically tend to droPeter Speyer-5/6/1997
146 Congrats on $$$$ made! I too am long LUV low 20's; it seems LUV gets whaWallace Rivers-5/5/1997
145 RE: LUV Market Patterns I was advised to buy LUV by my broker, when it was traLarry Leeth-5/5/1997
144 It appears that the talking heads are wrong again! Most felt that LUV's plaEmmo-4/29/1997
143 Roger: I think LUV was down because all the air carriers pretty much got hammerWallace Rivers-4/25/1997
142 >>I compared charts of LUV, AMR, UAL, U, and DA That's funny, becausRoger Zucchet-4/25/1997
141 .23 was what CNBC Squawk Box reported as consensus. Value Line had .19 for theWallace Rivers-4/24/1997
140 Wallace, I didn't realize there was so much of a disparity between expecteRoger Zucchet-4/24/1997
139 Hello out there...LUV great numbers (.34 vs. consensus .23). Any comments?Wallace Rivers-4/24/1997
138 To all on this thread (inactive as it may be): Positive mention on LUV by moneWallace Rivers-3/23/1997
137 Wallace, I have not followed LUV closely since I sold my shares a couple of moSam Citron-3/11/1997
136 Thread has been quiet lately...Anybody wish to comment, especially in light ofWallace Rivers-3/11/1997
135 I OBVIUOSLY ENTERED THIS DISCUSION LATE: ONE YEAR IS FOREVER. I DIDN'T REALmagic-2/17/1997
134 I think a year is more than enough to wait for this stock! Bought it at 31(?) hregine-2/17/1997
133 I HAVE NOT FOLLOWED (LUV) THAT LONG BUT CURRENTLY HOLD FEBRUARY AND MARCH OPTIOmagic-2/17/1997
132 Gruntal also likes LUV. From Briefings.com: "SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO (LUV) Sam Citron-2/11/1997
131 Wallace, Good Point! Either Lehman is being conservative or it's pretty slSam Citron-2/11/1997
130 Kind of strange...from the Reuters news wire, Lehman's price target is 25 oWallace Rivers-2/11/1997
129 Hi LUVers, Lehman today upgraded LUV from Neutral to Outperform. Whether or noSam Citron-2/11/1997
128 I think this is a great long term trading stock. I have frequently bought in tJeff George-2/9/1997
127 I still like Southwest but am waiting for them to solve their problems with theBryan Arnold-2/8/1997
126 Its been kind of quiet here lately, anyone still checking this thread out? If Jeff George-2/8/1997
125 Mark, If you read the press release, then it does not sound like the 1st QuartBryan Arnold-1/23/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News