SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Seagate Technology - Fundamentals
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1989 20 0 STX
Emcee:  Stitch Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1564 RE: Photogenic Ducks seagate.com Now if only CNBC or CNNFN or Bloomberg can lGus-3/31/2000
1563 <i>....any thought on this one other then a simple long SEG, short VRTS?&Gus-3/31/2000
1562 thx - whoa, pretty scary. I honestly don't know the derivation of the estimStruggling Investor-3/31/2000
1561 Folks, I have been quiet on this deal other them my original post objecting iniStitch-3/31/2000
1560 <<They are projected to make $.49 this year; the CEO stated on CNBC todayZ Analyzer-3/30/2000
1559 Thanks Tom. Lynn, I regret that you took my pointed reference to your naivete Gus-3/30/2000
1558 I should have added that I sold my SEG on Tuesday at 68 3/8. So I'm out of tom pope-3/30/2000
1557 I don't believe Gus was insulting. He was certainly being realistic. The tom pope-3/30/2000
1556 lastly, want to share this interesting article from Bloomberg: Seagate Shares FStruggling Investor-3/30/2000
1555 <<Is it really true that this couldn't have been all avoided by simplZ Analyzer-3/30/2000
1554 not quite that simple, sorry. SEG shareholders will be VRTS shareholders (or loStruggling Investor-3/30/2000
1553 Dear Struggling: Without taking into consideration if there is a possibility orLynn-3/30/2000
1552 Thx, Ad. Ditto's to all you said. Like you, I'm extremely concerned aboStruggling Investor-3/30/2000
1551 OT Gus only: There is absolutely no need to digress discussion to the level ofLynn-3/30/2000
1550 Struggling Investor - I agree with your post completely! I look at "vrts&KevRupert-3/30/2000
1549 sorry to burst the bubble (or pleasant dream), Ad. Don't feel like the loneStruggling Investor-3/30/2000
1548 Struggling Investor, I have no doubt you are right! I always try to look at thKevRupert-3/30/2000
1547 In the takeover stocks I follow there generally seems to be a 20% discount to tPaul Senior-3/30/2000
1546 Boy, you guys are really dreaming if you think that SEG management is going to Struggling Investor-3/30/2000
1545 Excellent idea regarding preference for the future IPO. I never even thought oKevRupert-3/30/2000
1544 Gus- Albeit naive, I like it.<g> And it wouldn't surprise me if sometMikeM54321-3/30/2000
1543 How can you be so naive? By itself, SEG's marketable securities (VRTS, SNDGus-3/30/2000
1542 Dear Advalorem: I recognize that _some_ people are disappointed because they trLynn-3/30/2000
1541 Hi Lynn, you make an excellent point that "seg" shareholders will benKevRupert-3/30/2000
1540 Thanks Gus, I didn't think I could feel more sick until I read your post. Robert Douglas-3/30/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News