SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Tekelec
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1648 32 0 TKLC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1573It is a bit amazing how TKLC has held up though. What with all the telecom capitBWAC-11/9/2000
1572I've been very remiss on posting to this thread, but TKLC's been holdingJohn Curtis-11/9/2000
1571Yep, I learned the hard way once, that no stock is immune from panic. Best, JoJohn F Beule-10/13/2000
1570Yeah especially this part "Highly unlikely, until foolishness takes over. BWAC-10/12/2000
1569"But TKLC could return to a 20 forward PE in this market" Good call, John F Beule-10/12/2000
1568Interesting. Off to read some more.BWAC-10/10/2000
1567Tekelec Adds Protocol Support to Test Broadband Services for Cable Industry bizJakeStraw-10/10/2000
1566Whew, tough crowd. Best, JohnJohn F Beule-9/21/2000
1565For the record, high on TKLC is 54 and change. It never hit 60.James Burke-9/20/2000
1564<Good luck in trying to rewind the clock,> Well now, never say never. I sBWAC-9/20/2000
1563John: The reason TKLC went to $6 was because SS7 software deployments are complBernard Levy-9/20/2000
1562Bernard: SS7 IS an integral part of the network, It is the critical piece of theJohn F Beule-9/20/2000
1561Your are discussing telecom equpt. suppliers in general, but ignoring the specifBernard Levy-9/20/2000
1560IMVHO: covering? Best, JohnJohn F Beule-9/20/2000
1559To answer your question of why I did't buy, at $6 we had a int'l meltdowJohn F Beule-9/20/2000
1558Very interesting that stock is attracting buying volume in a down market and dowPaul Nicholas-9/20/2000
1557<I want to own this stock (following it since $6), but I want to see the nextBWAC-9/20/2000
1556Yes, but spend at what price (better yet, whose)? I hope TKLC's only choicesJohn F Beule-9/20/2000
1555<i>What I think is a credulous risk, is that CLEC's and RBOC's arelml-9/20/2000
1554<<i>Sales don't mean diddly if you don't get paid.<</i>WTSherman-9/20/2000
1553What I think is a credulous risk, is that CLEC's and RBOC's are burning John F Beule-9/20/2000
1552Makes sense to me...albeit if I only looked at p/e's. That said, I agree thJohn F Beule-9/19/2000
1551You are right, there are positive earnings. But how do you value a company with Paul Nicholas-9/19/2000
1550<<i>but will the company make money in the near term<</i> I&#WTSherman-9/19/2000
1549Anyone like to comment on yesterday? Chart does not look good. I would expect a John F Beule-9/19/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News