The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong? | Political Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
The Supreme Court, All Right or All Wrong?

An SI Board Since July 2005

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
3029	28	0

Emcee: sandintoes	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1604	<B>March 10, 2006 Why Has McCain Become A Bush Cheerleader?</B> Ch	sandintoes	-	3/12/2006
1603	They love their crooks in Mass. They don't care as long as they have money	sandintoes	-	3/12/2006
1602	What's interesting is that Thurmond living to over 100 has bamboozelled the	CYBERKEN	-	3/11/2006
1601	Even if that would work, and I don't think it would, I don't think it w	ManyMoose	-	3/11/2006
1600	The Founders never intended that. The small states were empowered by having an e	CYBERKEN	-	3/11/2006
1599	I got an idea: Any member of Congress who wants any earmarks (and that covers mo	CYBERKEN	-	3/11/2006
1598	Now THERE are a couple of good arguments for term limits! <I> Do you thin	ManyMoose	-	3/11/2006
1597	That's like Strom...South Carolina would have sent him back as long as he wa	sandintoes	-	3/11/2006
1596	Many smaller states keep their delegation for a long time. When I was growing u	ManyMoose	-	3/11/2006
1595	That is an excellent point about the smaller states, I'd never really though	sandintoes	-	3/11/2006
1594	Term limits when people are so senile, they forget where they are is a must, but	sandintoes	-	3/11/2006
1593	The Bridge to Nowhere will be a bridge to "Somewhere" but you have to	ManyMoose	-	3/11/2006
1592	I should not have left out the "Grassley Jungle", and Ted Stevens defe	CYBERKEN	-	3/11/2006
1591	Oops. It was Ginzburg. O'Connor ill-served us by remaining awake...	CYBERKEN	-	3/11/2006
1590	I thought Ginzburg was the one who slept. You can get rid of her any time.	ManyMoose	-	3/11/2006
1589	The times term limits have worked GREAT with presidents more often than not sinc	CYBERKEN	-	3/11/2006
1588	Terms are limited by the people most affected by them: the constituents. If Or	ManyMoose	-	3/11/2006
1587	The idea that term limits are undesirable because they end the careers of the &q	CYBERKEN	-	3/11/2006
1586	Yes, but it would have gotten rid of Clarence Thomas too... supremecourtus.gov	sandintoes	-	3/10/2006
1585	Bush 41 could have appointed no one. But, as I recall, Souter bamboozelled the c	CYBERKEN	-	3/10/2006
1584	Given the exceptionally PUTRID lineup of senile and treasonous Senate Democrats	CYBERKEN	-	3/10/2006
1583	The Federalist Society is the most advanced of the slowly-emerging restoration m	CYBERKEN	-	3/10/2006
1582	A twelve-year lifetime term limit would have accomplished that already...	CYBERKEN	-	3/10/2006
1581	Too true, what Leno with his questions he asks of people on the street...they do	sandintoes	-	3/10/2006
1580	Boy I go along with that...either or both!	sandintoes	-	3/10/2006

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):