SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11?
An SI Board Since February 2003
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
20039 79 0
Emcee:  Don Earl Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16050<i>Apparently some don't see it that way ... </i> Way back in tTigerPaw-9/19/2006
16049<i>Tests show that 2 hours at 1500 degrees wouldn't cause collapse. &lTigerPaw-9/19/2006
16048<i>Exactly. </i> Perhaps you didn't notice. He could do the enTigerPaw-9/19/2006
16047<<< How thick are those pans? 20ga? they were corrugated. How come I doDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16046We both agree they were poured on pan type steel decks, as you call them. How Orcastraiter-9/19/2006
16045I think it does matter. If it was normal concrete reinforced with #3 bars 16&quoOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16044<i>Not sure yet, that's an open question in my mind. I did see a pictuOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16043The point is...first these guys said the floors failed. We all saw the cartoon oOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16042<<< You don't know anything about the floors on the WTC >>>David Howe-9/19/2006
16041<<< You can see the dust coming out of the building way ahead of the coDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16040<<< "NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16039I think that you are making statements outside your area of expertise then. You Orcastraiter-9/19/2006
16038Whatever dude...I won't even get into such a nit picking argument with you. Doug R-9/19/2006
16037You can see the dust coming out of the building way ahead of the collapse zone iOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16036<<< <i>You're not in construction or building design are you&David Howe-9/19/2006
16035<<< We're seeing dust coming from the building in the early part ofDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16034"NIST’s findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is Orcastraiter-9/19/2006
16033<i>You're not in construction or building design are you</i> AnOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16032We're seeing dust coming from the building in the early part of the collapseOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16031LOL...you're not keeping up with the story. FEMA said pancake, and that was Orcastraiter-9/19/2006
16030I love how they show a building that's collapsed and say this is what a pancDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16029<<< I can't imagine why a weak form of concrete would be used if thDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16028<<< Well where is the specification for the floors? What kind of concreDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16027<<< NIST says the floors did not fail. >>> I think you are reDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16026I've seen it. Thanks.Orcastraiter-9/19/2006
16025Go through the Jones presentation when you have time. The molten metal is thorouDoug R-9/19/2006
16024Just the Jones, Ryan and Griffin information I posted today is enough to prove tDoug R-9/19/2006
16023The molten metals were widely reported in the MSM and in many eyewitness accountOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16022I'm asking the questions. I've seen no spec from the WTC construction doOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16021As for the molten steel, Steven Jones has put together a great slide presentatioDoug R-9/19/2006
16020The floors were steel reinforced. I can't imagine why a weak form of concretDoug R-9/19/2006
16019<i>They can't 100% agree and they are discussing several possible explOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16018<i>Correct, correct, correct. A red herring indeed.</i> Well where Orcastraiter-9/19/2006
16017<i>as the floors failed</i> NIST says the floors did not fail.Orcastraiter-9/19/2006
16016<<< It's amazing that you...a guy that claims two years of structurDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16015<<< IMO, the whole concrete dust speculation is a red herring. The concDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16014<<< the pancake theory works if you demolish sections of the core aheadDavid Howe-9/19/2006
16013<i>Except for one thing. It's insane to think that wireless would workOrcastraiter-9/19/2006
16012No...at 480 degrees the joists would not deform. Link or lie. Tests show that Doug R-9/19/2006
16011RE: "No, currently the physics says there must of been explosives on every Don Earl-9/19/2006
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News