SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
XOMA. Bull or Bear?
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
17367 72 0 XOMA
Emcee:  Olu Emuleomo Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1606711,000 subjects trial, Lilly is going to expend some $100M in Xigris trial, evenCacaito-9/21/2002
16066This should make all Xomaers happy.. biz.yahoo.comArthur Radley-9/17/2002
16065deleteEdscharp-9/15/2002
16064Larry, I think the question was about the word re submission. Cacaito, know aboaknahow-9/12/2002
16063Class 1 is two months. Six months is a small victory for XOMA. Think it was CaLarryS-9/12/2002
16062Aha, I see you have the actual BGEN release, which wasn't up when I posted ttom pope-9/12/2002
16061Tom what is meant by resubmission? "After review of the information Biogen aknahow-9/12/2002
16060Biogen sees FDA finishing Amevive review in 6 months Thursday September 12, 6:1tom pope-9/12/2002
16059Cacaito, just saw the news about Johnny U. Seems like only yesterday the guy inBluegreen-9/12/2002
16058Not bad at all, it just took you 21 hours to figure it out! Blue, Dna is a dissCacaito-9/11/2002
16057Xoma's version of "give us your hungry and your poor", is give us aknahow-9/11/2002
16056Cacaito, are you a buyer of DNA at these levels????Bluegreen-9/10/2002
16055Good agreement, no more legal expenses, nice sharing of technologies, xoma contrCacaito-9/10/2002
16054Cacaito, can you explain the latest BSTE, XOMA situation????Bluegreen-9/10/2002
16053I subscribe to redherring, but its' editorials leave me cold and I will not aknahow-9/9/2002
16052George, what do you think??? redherring.comBluegreen-9/9/2002
16051Oh, I get it now........what have you done for me TODAY?????LOLBluegreen-9/9/2002
16050O.K. so. He was hopeful then, but two years have gone by. Is he hopeful now? aknahow-9/9/2002
16049What are you talking about???? I wish you would reread it instead of just glancBluegreen-9/9/2002
16048O.K. Giroirs statement is correct, as it referred to the P II U.S. trial. But taknahow-9/9/2002
16047George, you might want to reread the quotation from Dr. G. irweb.swmed.eduBluegreen-9/9/2002
16046Cacaito or Bob, please read this and then tell me what effect if any it would haBluegreen-9/9/2002
16045No, I had not seen that. A real shame.aknahow-9/6/2002
16044George, have you seen this???? news.yahoo.comBluegreen-9/6/2002
16043Great news finalliy, its impact on xoma is a big question mark..................Robert K.-9/6/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News