SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16333IBM, GE, DuPont, MSFT, CSCO earnings overstated by $1.5B+? Message 17679195 Lazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16332Obesity?Win Smith-7/1/2002
16331LOL! Your answer was as funny as mine, St. Laz.Poet-7/1/2002
16330I may be too late to the party, but....alcoholism?Poet-7/1/2002
16329Fraud? :-)Lazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16328<i>I am a subscriber and I actually read the damn thing</i> Unfair dLazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16327<i>Which, as you said, is the current situation, so we end up no worse offLane3-7/1/2002
16326<i>straw men</i> The statement was qualified. I wrote: <i>allTigerPaw-7/1/2002
16325This is surprising? Low-class businesses with sleazy clientele always get a booLazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16324<i>I wonder if the voucher advocates have thought this one through all theLazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16323I saw that earlier. Excellent post. How come you get this issue right, but theLazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16322Oh, I noticed that paradox before I posted. But it applies equally well in casLazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16321<i>If you are debating paying doctor's bills out-of-pocket without reiLane3-7/1/2002
16320As you should be. You have much to be modest about! :-)Constant Reader-7/1/2002
16319I am very proud of my humility.Lazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16318Something about equality of intellectual capacity, I am sure.Constant Reader-7/1/2002
16317As that undoubtedly depends on the definition of "I," it seems one wouConstant Reader-7/1/2002
16316He prefers to argue with straw men.Lazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16315LOL! Appreciate your abstention..... I'm going out to eat some lunch now..Original Mad Dog-7/1/2002
16314<i>Anything that is subject to more than one interpretation goes. </i&gLazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16313I thought you were acting rather angular this morning.Constant Reader-7/1/2002
16312As you know, I have to exclude myself because I am a subscriber and I actually rConstant Reader-7/1/2002
16311I cite the basic law of the land, you cite nebulous "historical foundationsLazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16310I posted this on TTMAR this morning and no one got it yet....so I'll see howOriginal Mad Dog-7/1/2002
16309Very few of the privileged are pushing vouchers - they already have what they waConstant Reader-7/1/2002
16308Ah. That's a very reasonable distinction. Thanks.Poet-7/1/2002
16307Several here who share your distaste for "under God" have stated that Michael M-7/1/2002
16306<i>"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction."&lLane3-7/1/2002
16305<i>How do you distinguished privileged from very privileged? </i> I Lane3-7/1/2002
16304Investigation of all tragic accidents should always consider all the facts. If Michael M-7/1/2002
16303Didn't anyone ever tell you that humility is saintly? Get with the program!Poet-7/1/2002
16302<i>Do tell us how the folks in the EPA's Federal Facilities Program loLane3-7/1/2002
16301"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." is the phrConstant Reader-7/1/2002
16300LOL! I think the statement was authored by someone who has a license to exercisOriginal Mad Dog-7/1/2002
16299WELL? ANSWER THE QUESTION! Message 17678494Lazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16298Uh oh. Why do I feel as though are are a few hatches to be battened? Go for it.Poet-7/1/2002
16297Ah, a paradox! We should conclude that the Fed. Courts often get it wrong, and Original Mad Dog-7/1/2002
16296<i>Jews and Lutherans (a Protestant sect) also have slightly different verLane3-7/1/2002
16295Yes. :-)Lazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16294Well, you had quite an effect on me. You convinced me that the federal courts oLazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16293Apparently you haven't heard from me, then.Lazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16292How do you distinguished privileged from very privileged? Or is that privileged?Poet-7/1/2002
16291Laz is a saint, doncha think?Poet-7/1/2002
16290ROFL! I'm sure he will be pleased to hear that.Constant Reader-7/1/2002
16289<i>That particular rule has been highly controversial. </i> ApparentLane3-7/1/2002
16288Didn't see any reference to Christian anything in the article. You seem to Michael M-7/1/2002
16287The military has a long history of cooperating with movie makers. Rules vary. Michael M-7/1/2002
16286<i>I used to be pro death penalty and have changed my mind after reading tOriginal Mad Dog-7/1/2002
16285Yessum, ThreadGod (who, as <b>any</b> ninny knows, outranks TGOHAE Lazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16284Interesting point, very interesting. Your summary of Medicare is basically corrOriginal Mad Dog-7/1/2002
16283I have problems with the DP because of its irreversibility combined with a systeOriginal Mad Dog-7/1/2002
16282<i>So I think the answer is that some level of education ought to be taxpaLane3-7/1/2002
16281Lion-feeder. I'll dip my toe in. I used to be pro death penalty and have cPoet-7/1/2002
16280I was thinking the same thing. ;-)Constant Reader-7/1/2002
16279Ohhhhh man. That's like throwing raw meat into a cage of peckish lions. :-)Poet-7/1/2002
16278Judge Finds Federal Executions Unconstitutional Mon Jul 1,10:52 AM ET NEW YORConstant Reader-7/1/2002
16277Jews and Lutherans (a Protestant sect) also have slightly different versions of Poet-7/1/2002
16276That is nutz! Not to mention not healthy for the girl's physical developmenPoet-7/1/2002
16275Hi Steven, I said my piece about the recent Court of Appeals decision on the PlPoet-7/1/2002
16274<i>Perhaps you would comment on a more basic question--why should educatioOriginal Mad Dog-7/1/2002
16273I found your post very thoughtful. This is one point I had never considered: &Lane3-7/1/2002
16272Is the world going crazy, or what? <i>The minimum age for attendance at tE-7/1/2002
16271Thoughts on vouchers, posted elsewhere: Message 17678075Original Mad Dog-7/1/2002
16270Hey Laz, Thought I would brighten up Monday morning around here: abanet.org Original Mad Dog-7/1/2002
16269<i>I think it would make sense to remove the words from the "officialLane3-7/1/2002
16268You got the number right--if you were raised Protestant. I did some research anLane3-7/1/2002
16267<i>NO ONE is required to pledge allegiance.</i> Required by law, noDayuhan-7/1/2002
16266If I got the number right, it was probably by accident. I'm hardly an authoDayuhan-7/1/2002
16265<i>I can't help noting that you are often quick to criticize the US, eDayuhan-7/1/2002
16264<i>I guess the bible study group skipped the 6th commandment. </i> Lane3-7/1/2002
16263A shining example of Christian mercy... I guess the bible study group skipped thDayuhan-7/1/2002
16262Ashcroft Aggressively Pursues Death Penalty By Dan Eggen Washington Post StaffLane3-7/1/2002
16261<i>I'm often guilty of wanting the last word</i> I reported whaLane3-7/1/2002
16260<i>"An innocent person convicted isn't justice. That's my takone_less-7/1/2002
16259I'm shopping a screenplay about a graduate teaching assistant who causes a cMichael M-7/1/2002
16258Nobody told me it was an open book test.Michael M-7/1/2002
16257z z z z z z z z zMichael M-7/1/2002
16256Hey, something just occurred to me. The term "Death Penalty" is an oxyone_less-7/1/2002
16255<i>Said it would decide whether police who take news reporters into peopleLazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16254OK. "Against DP. Period."Lazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16253I'm often guilty of wanting the last word but, in this case, must admit to kMichael M-7/1/2002
16252Laz, sometimes you seem willfully obtuse. The history of European settlement onMichael M-7/1/2002
16251The first line used fringe-y, the last was this: <i>The above is why I coE-7/1/2002
16250I asked you why you said I was on the "fringe" and you responded by teMichael M-7/1/2002
16249<i>"Notice that all the conservatives..."</i> To broad tone_less-7/1/2002
16248<i>How odd that someone would know how many flags are burned every year. &E-7/1/2002
16247How odd that someone would know how many flags are burned every year. I supposeMichael M-7/1/2002
16246Notice that all the conservatives who say that modern judges must channel the spTigerPaw-7/1/2002
16245<i>"I don't consider saying that removing pro-God rhetoric from tone_less-7/1/2002
16244<i>I don't follow how the concept of "One Indivisible Nation"TigerPaw-7/1/2002
16243Sorry if I misunderstood. This led me to the opposite conclusion. <i> LaLazarus_Long-7/1/2002
16242I don't follow how the concept of "One Indivisible Nation" was deone_less-6/30/2002
16241<i>You can't take the two words out and not replace them or you lose tTigerPaw-6/30/2002
16240Got lucky. Is truth a defense against the PC Police? It works for libel and slLazarus_Long-6/30/2002
16239I'd say I was sorry but we were atheists. I'll bet they reacted pretty mE-6/30/2002
16238GOHAE is <i>all you need to know.</i> And keep it in mind. That anE-6/30/2002
16237Message 17676603E-6/30/2002
16236<i>Do you object to the DP under any circumstances? Or only because the prE-6/30/2002
16235Talk about cruel...: June 30, 2002 Secrecy of Japan's Executions Is CritiE-6/30/2002
16234I didn't know until I read taht that the amount in Wisc was $5000. Also, theE-6/30/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News