SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Seagate Technology - Fundamentals
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1989 20 0 STX
Emcee:  Stitch Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1639 This was my thinking a few days ago: Message 13329700Starlight-4/2/2000
1638 Kevin- I like it. And it's something I wouldn't mind at all. But of couMikeM54321-4/2/2000
1637 Please don't misconstrue my comments that this deal is fair or that this wiKevin Linder-4/2/2000
1636 S&P doesn't like the deal, either. exerpt from report: Valuation - 30-Struggling Investor-4/2/2000
1635 Kevin, thank you for your assessment. We all believe SEG's core DD businesStu E.-4/2/2000
1634 Z- Point well taken. ES- Oh. Sorry about that. I did misunderstand your firstMikeM54321-4/2/2000
1633 Mike - Perhaps my analogy was poor -- I DON'T think I'm getting fair vaStarlight-4/2/2000
1632 For anyone who has faith in Luczo's honesty, remember that $4 or $8 billionZ Analyzer-4/2/2000
1631 <i>"it will be like trading a bird in the hand (SEG) for a bird in tMikeM54321-4/2/2000
1630 I bought SEG just recently because of the value in the SEG holdings, plus the pStarlight-4/2/2000
1629 <i>"We already have the opportunity to sell our interest in VRTS by MikeM54321-4/2/2000
1628 MikeM -- at this point the "exchange" is set .467 shares of VRTS and Kevin Linder-4/2/2000
1627 Mike <<<mass exodus of SEG, turned VRTS, sharehoders selling on the dseminole-4/2/2000
1626 <i>"....most of the big brokerage firms are calling for VRTS to be aMikeM54321-4/2/2000
1625 Gus- Never before having read the piece you posted, as soon as I started read iMikeM54321-4/2/2000
1624 Not really an institutional investor here Stu. This is more my money I am playKevin Linder-4/2/2000
1623 <i>"And you're letting your cynacism get the worst of you."MikeM54321-4/2/2000
1622 Thanks Stitch. I do like your query at the end of the post. I suspect even EMC Berk-4/2/2000
1621 Am I the only one who suspects that the reason Veritas is being given the otherZ Analyzer-4/2/2000
1620 Questions, questions, more damn questions. <b> Curious coincidence We haGus-4/2/2000
1619 <<Mark- What does their skill have to do with it? What I believe a lot ofZ Analyzer-4/2/2000
1618 It looks like we finally have online proof that the proverbial greater fools arGus-4/2/2000
1617 Sam, I underplayed the ethical and legal aspects of this deal in my post becauGus-4/2/2000
1616 Speaking of institutional investors, doesn't Kevin Linder contribute to thiStu E.-4/1/2000
1615 <i>"In your opinion what are the odds that a Far East company would MikeM54321-4/1/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News