SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
IMES
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1901 6 0 IMESQ
Emcee:  Sam Insalaco Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1651 All: For all those who haven't "bailed" as Perry puts it, we appdon denson-4/30/1998
1650 Well, I bailed when they ran the stock into the ground...Perry Stewart-4/27/1998
1649 >>>You can see we very much intend to keep this a public company. Simpicecreambug-4/26/1998
1648 Hello Perry: Always good to see an old shareholder like you posting! Glad to don denson-4/26/1998
1647 Just a note to say hello. Hope everything is looking up. I havent been keeping Perry Stewart-4/24/1998
1646 Thomas, Was it disclosed when and how Cadence paid the $500K to IMS? Prior toLarry Huang-4/24/1998
1645 Larry and JIm, Larry I add my thanks for your posting. Jim - not much. I'vThos-4/24/1998
1644 Larry, Lots of interesting information, there! Thanks for taking the time to jimpit-4/23/1998
1643 This one is an FYI about the IMS bankruptcy for those who are interested... InLarry Huang-4/23/1998
1642 That's easy, Ivan, an honest man.Thos-4/22/1998
1641 Gary, You're right about me stirring the pot, for which I apologize. I doivan solotaroff-4/21/1998
1640 Ivan - why are you stirring the pot? Are you looking for the Instigator of the Gary Stern-4/21/1998
1639 Thos: So Frank's a shill now? Hmm. I thought you guys were appealling to tivan solotaroff-4/21/1998
1638 You know, Frank, the interesting feature about your responses are that they canThos-4/20/1998
1637 Here now, don't confuse discussion of the value of the IMS library with thaFrank-4/20/1998
1636 They can read to you as you wish, tovarisch, but what you mean by "having Thos-4/20/1998
1635 Don, Don, Don, Mostly lurking for the S opera, though I have an agenda, too: rivan solotaroff-4/20/1998
1634 Ivan, Ivan, Ivan: Everyone here has an agenda. There's the rub. I like Fdon denson-4/20/1998
1633 "Based on the quality of Frank's solely opinion based alleged answers ivan solotaroff-4/20/1998
1632 Based on the quality of Frank's solely opinion based alleged answers to theThos-4/20/1998
1631 FRANK, Way to stick up for yourself, man! You've handled yourself brillianivan solotaroff-4/20/1998
1630 Greg, "I would be on top of the highest building in Austin ..." Donivan solotaroff-4/20/1998
1629 The reality I was referring to is the seeming overvaluation of the IMSlib. FraFrank-4/20/1998
1628 I believe the $500k number was associated strictly with the standard cell libraFrank-4/20/1998
1627 IMSLIB, IMS cell library, IMS IP, IMS technology, IMS proprietary design methodLarry Huang-4/20/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):