SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
USRX
An SI Board Since November 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
18024 14 0
Emcee:  damniseedemons Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
16574 Actually this is a further comment on my own premature post: Sorry, Jeff: GJanice Shell-3/25/1997
16573 Dave-- My taste in stocks is, uh, impeccable. PLAT thread dead as a doornail,Janice Shell-3/25/1997
16572 <GGGGGG> Actually, with a guy like him it might not be a laughing matter.Jeffery E. Forrest-3/25/1997
16571 What is this thread about??????????????????????????????????????????????????????Tim Luke-3/25/1997
16570 Bob-- I think you'll find that wading into a thread and issuing ultimata iJanice Shell-3/25/1997
16569 Bonehead-Booby (BB), Please go away (I even asked nicely). You are a bother, Pullin-GS-3/25/1997
16568 David-- Well done! I find it odd that he keeps saying he's not really intJanice Shell-3/25/1997
16567 GGGGGGGGGGG PRBPullin-GS-3/25/1997
16566 Craze, Well, scrapps was (is) the mascot. Whipping boys come and go. It depenPullin-GS-3/25/1997
16565 Scrapps-- Right. That's <b>ALL WE NEED</b>: the "DustbuJanice Shell-3/25/1997
16564 Yeah, Jeff-- Where were you when Paul and Derek and Scrapps and I were under fJanice Shell-3/25/1997
16563 Hey Janice. Nice to see you over hear too. Take it you own this barker also? david decamp-3/25/1997
16562 Glenn-- I dunno. Usually these sorts of suits don't do much damage to theJanice Shell-3/25/1997
16561 OT--Glenn, OT Did you ever meet a Jim or Lou Simon? Sorry it took so long toPat Buglak-3/25/1997
16560 Jeffrey >>Obviously you are suffering from serious delusions, visions ofHassell Anderson-3/25/1997
16559 Jeffrey, >>Anyway, LeRACK is the scummiest of the scum. Nothing but a faHassell Anderson-3/25/1997
16558 Bob, >if it happens tomarrow, I will send that letter to webmaster. If you dDwight E. Karlsen-3/25/1997
16557 Jeff - on INTC Calls came to my mind also; I am going to at least price them oDwight E. Karlsen-3/25/1997
16556 I already sent mine Bob as I'd guess most of the others have...So just pullScrapps-3/25/1997
16555 Eric, thanks for the response. I've yet to read through it, just skimmed itdrmorgan-3/25/1997
16554 >>However, you must realize that I will not tolerate abuse and harassmentScrapps-3/25/1997
16553 Derek, The info about Total Control is way off in that article, although the rEric Prigge-3/25/1997
16552 If the Webmaster takes time to read this board, I believe he will come to diffeMichael Anthony-3/25/1997
16551 >> Note that there have been cases here at SI where threads were shut dowdrmorgan-3/25/1997
16550 Well Scrapps, like I said, if it happens tomarrow, I will send that letter to wRobert Graham-3/25/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News