LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
LUMM - Lumenon Innovative Lightwave Technology Inc.

An SI Board Since February 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2484	45	0	LUMM

Emcee: Currency	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1659	???Are taxes due in Canada as well??? Yep. End of April. Preston Langley - Ju	Don Johnstone	-	3/25/2000
1658	Don, Why are you calling Preston Langley and what on earth is he doing in Time	Yankee Trader	-	3/25/2000
1657	Asking for something that has never been done is merely asking a rhetorical que	UR_In&Out	-	3/25/2000
1656	A yield of 80%? And just how did you arrive at this figure? Do you have any ide	jjs64	-	3/25/2000
1655	This exercise makes me appreciate the hurdles that securities analysts face whe	UR_In&Out	-	3/25/2000
1654	<i>The cost of each chip is reported to be somewhere between $50 to $100	pat mudge	-	3/25/2000
1653	LUMM A story stock high risk high reward I am not trying to convince anyone on	nord	-	3/25/2000
1652	Projected Sales/Earnings for Lumenon Pat: Here are my best guesstimates: It i	UR_In&Out	-	3/24/2000
1651	Pat, Will you please share with me the companies that you follow that make p	Yankee Trader	-	3/24/2000
1650	<i>Pat: By asking if Molex would rather have $200 a share are you suggest	UR_In&Out	-	3/24/2000
1649	<i> 1.Is their any possible scenario you can visualize and express where	pat mudge	-	3/24/2000
1648	Pat Mudge would you allow me to ask the following of you? 1.Is their any poss	dds1	-	3/24/2000
1647	For ease of reading, I'm putting our point-counter-points in the form of a	pat mudge	-	3/24/2000
1646	s-words, Lumenon is also 1500 posts behind since they have accomplished nothing	greeze	-	3/23/2000
1645	greeze, you're about 1500 posts behind.	s-words	-	3/23/2000
1644	Lumenon never performed or delivered what they said. I was at OFC and word was	greeze	-	3/23/2000
1643	<i> I see that all of Ms. Mudge's interpretations are negative </I	UR_In&Out	-	3/23/2000
1642	YT, I look at the LUMM/Molex agreement as a buyout in progress. There are achie	Don Johnstone	-	3/23/2000
1641	Don, I am reeling with laughter at #1637. My sentiments exactly. Yesterday,	Yankee Trader	-	3/23/2000
1640	Fred, you've caught it. Long postitis. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ	Don Johnstone	-	3/23/2000
1639	<I>Let's read the SEC filing again: >>>> As of the date	UR_In&Out	-	3/23/2000
1638	<i>How long this cleansing will last remains to be seen. Not too long, I	pat mudge	-	3/23/2000
1637	???i wonder why??? Me too. Maybe she is just altruistic and concerned for ou	Don Johnstone	-	3/23/2000
1636	Probably because she has done a fair amount of dd & is willing to share it.	Regis McConnell	-	3/23/2000
1635	Somebody is trying real hard to discredit LUMM i wonder why???	Mike Hardy	-	3/23/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):