How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
How to best deal with KOOKS at this web site

An SI Board Since March 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1894	6	0

Emcee: Iceberg	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
169	>The really crazy thing now is that skang did get fired (IMHO) Peter,	Iceberg	-	4/11/1997
168	Ice, I agree with you completely that skang should have been challenged, and a	fut_trade	-	4/11/1997
167	>My personal feeling is that he should have been ignored. >I am very int	Iceberg	-	4/11/1997
166	Ice, One last post here -- sorry. Must strike a nerve somewhere. Here is anoth	fut_trade	-	4/11/1997
165	Ice, I guess other people may feel as I do. Check this: techstocks.com Skang	fut_trade	-	4/11/1997
164	Ice, -- sort of off topic -- Do you think that investors had the right to inte	fut_trade	-	4/11/1997
163	>check out some very strange exchanges Peter, Very strange, indeed! Th	Iceberg	-	4/11/1997
162	Ice, check out some very strange exchanges on the CRUS thread. I think investor	fut_trade	-	4/11/1997
161	>to see a nice response to a type I Gottfried, It was a nice response,	Iceberg	-	4/11/1997
160	ICE, to see a nice response to a type I see techstocks.com Gottfried	Gottfried	-	4/11/1997
159	ICE (non-KOOK), I decided to stick around after all. If you haven't purchas	Gottfried	-	4/10/1997
158	>You know how things can change so much in TWO days around here. Linda,	Iceberg	-	4/10/1997
157	>ICE, I may be off-line for a day or two. PC needs maintenance. Gottfried,	Iceberg	-	4/10/1997
156	> would also like to see SI post their own rules prominently, perhaps on the	Iceberg	-	4/10/1997
155	Linda, right! I'm not addicted to SI - I can quit or leave it alone any tim	Gottfried	-	4/10/1997
154	GM, I'm not sure if I would be able to make it without being online for a f	Linda Pearson	-	4/9/1997
153	ICE, I may be off-line for a day or two. PC needs maintenance. Gottfried	Gottfried	-	4/9/1997
152	ICE, pass the info on to SI with a recommendation to make it available to new m	Gottfried	-	4/9/1997
151	Ice , Re: Where should we classify this kind of post ? I Like<b> Iom&	Herb Fuller	-	4/9/1997
150	>Let's leave it at that. Gottfried, Assuming we've determined	Iceberg	-	4/9/1997
149	ICE and Stan, good work. Let's leave it at that. 'Kook of the week'	Gottfried	-	4/9/1997
148	To All: Summary for review and comment --> classification of problem posters	Iceberg	-	4/9/1997
147	>I apologize for having to use two posts to do this. Stan, Good work. T	Iceberg	-	4/9/1997
146	RE: Summary Post -- Comments. . . . . . . . First of all I apologize for having	Stan Walker	-	4/9/1997
145	RE: Summary Post -- Response Protocols type I -- 1. ignore the post completel	Stan Walker	-	4/9/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):