SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Frank Coluccio Technology Forum - ASAP
An SI Board Since September 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1782 50 0
Emcee:  ftth Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1757 What was the name of the company in Seattle that was doing similar things a couftth-6/24/2000
1756 Future 10 Terabyte 3.5 inch Holographic Disk Drive Technology: members.xoom.coXenogenetic-6/24/2000
1755 Hi Scott, I take it that Mike Drummond still has SR on the "to do" Raymond Duray-6/21/2000
1754 I have heard that James Palmer does not even have a phd. Just a rumor to me, buSrexley-6/21/2000
1753 Hi Cobalt, Palmer dissociated himself from SR somewhere is early '99. He Raymond Duray-6/21/2000
1752 Ray, my point was not to dis 5 dimension stuff. But when I read the abstract bIlaine-6/20/2000
1751 Hi Cobalt, You might want to check out the alternative reality on the New FraRaymond Duray-6/20/2000
1750 Nobody ever responded to this post, but after reading this I became convinced tIlaine-6/20/2000
1749 Hi Cobalt, Re: <i>How can anyone manipulate SilkRoad stock when there wRaymond Duray-6/20/2000
1748 Re: "Network Tutorial" Hi Jim, Thanks for the update on the develoRaymond Duray-6/16/2000
1747 I have an opinion about Iridium - the company failed, not because of fraud, misIlaine-6/14/2000
1746 The fact that someone started a thread about a company and posted on that threaIlaine-6/14/2000
1745 How can anyone manipulate SilkRoad stock when there wasn't any?Ilaine-6/14/2000
1744 <i>'Now get this; I contend the fact that these two gurus of their reaxial-6/14/2000
1743 Quite the opposite. <This was a private company so consequently your statemKW Wingman-6/14/2000
1742 It has nothing to do with my reading. It may have something to do with your reaKW Wingman-6/14/2000
1741 KW Wingman: Gosh, I don't know what burr has gotten under your saddle, butwonk-6/14/2000
1740 Hi, KW Wingman - Those of us who watch the steady parade of wannabe technology axial-6/14/2000
1739 I am not mistaken other than the actual number of their posts was slightly lessKW Wingman-6/13/2000
1738 Brother Ray - <i>'I agree with you Jim, if I had a wofdm I'd keeaxial-6/13/2000
1737 You are mistaken about the percentage of posts by Frank on the SilkRoad thread.Ilaine-6/13/2000
1736 You said that you hated to admit that Kachina was correct all this time. Does iKW Wingman-6/13/2000
1735 You said that you hated to admit that Kachina was correct all this time. Does iKW Wingman-6/13/2000
1734 Slickroad <Should be coming to a courtroom near you soon, and I'm going KW Wingman-6/13/2000
1733 The facts are that Frank started the Slikroad thread with Ahhaha and posted twoKW Wingman-6/13/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News