SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Biotech vs. Shorts
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
427 27 0
Emcee:  Biomaven Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
177Message 10938455 Yeah, except for the two broken ankles and deflated ball. IMOscaram(o)uche-8/24/1999
176 BCRX popped sharply today - up 9 points, presumably on the back of day-trader sBiomaven-8/24/1999
175 There was a similar Reuters story about LIPO, commenting on high implied volatiBiomaven-8/24/1999
174 I think LIPO is being shorted today could anyone confirm ? Lipo is passing befdalroi-8/24/1999
173 Here's some CLTR options comment. Note the comment that the stock is "Biomaven-8/24/1999
172 DAK, Then you should definitely link in PB's excellent (as always) responsbiowa-8/18/1999
171 Thought this was worth linking in for the thread: Message 10991259 DAK LLCF-8/18/1999
170 What's everyone's take on BCRX? Thanks, GlennManly-8/17/1999
169 Peter, Having started this, I'll chime in w/ my one liners pro and con on biowa-8/17/1999
168 PB, I'll give it a shot: <i>SEPR - seldane/allegra case was one in Biomaven-8/17/1999
167 Thanks a lot. Willing to make a 1-2-liner defense of SEPR's (pseudo) critiPseudo Biologist-8/17/1999
166 <You also reminded me how much I don't know about several of these comparkrw-8/17/1999
165 Re <<OK. Now that we know the arguments can we disprove them?>> PrPseudo Biologist-8/17/1999
164 Speaking of shorts... you guys see what's going on in XOMA... anyone think LLCF-8/17/1999
163 >> OK. Now that we know the arguments can we disprove them. << Proscaram(o)uche-8/17/1999
162 Let me see what I can add. Some of the short tidbits I have heard VRTX - OvervVector1-8/17/1999
161 Thanks, as I stated originally, the idea was to play "devil's advocatePseudo Biologist-8/17/1999
160 <<PB. have to agree with your 'list' pretty much, but...CELG is srkrw-8/17/1999
159 David, <i>may be dirty numbers </i> I absolutely agree. However EBiomaven-8/16/1999
158 < list of biotechs sorted by open short interest > Out of your list CHIRLLCF-8/16/1999
157 PB. have to agree with your 'list' pretty much, but...CELG is sorta bromike head-8/16/1999
156 Peter, yes (S) is (Short). Thanks for the analysis. You are very right that wPseudo Biologist-8/16/1999
155 P(Short?)B: Nice (nasty?) set of one-liners. If you take (the not unreasonabBiomaven-8/16/1999
154 oops, thought I was over on Son of T/FIF, sorry 'bout that. <i>ThMike McFarland-8/16/1999
153 I suspect a good portion of Elan might be an arbitrage playceleryroot.com-8/16/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News