SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
19079 388 0 ORCL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
17954Hi to both of you. Yes it is, and I for one am still surprised. However (and yoehasfjord-2/2/2003
17953May the force be with you. So pleasant to find a positive thought on SI. Bobrobert b furman-2/1/2003
17952It is going up because the software business is improving! Hard to believe therLizzie Tudor-2/1/2003
17951Showing strength in a down market. These are what we look for as they are the nrobert b furman-2/1/2003
17950Hi RBF. Please check out message # 17949. And once again, Take Care.ehasfjord-2/1/2003
17949I don't believe what ORCL did today... It went UP. Seems like I'm a dayehasfjord-1/31/2003
17948MeDroogies, you mean for today. I expect GWB and party to turn up the pounding Qualified Opinion-1/31/2003
17947Nope. I don't think 17 will happen in a day, and I think there is some downMeDroogies-1/31/2003
17946oh I thought you thought I was nuts for thinking orcl could rally to 17. A lot Lizzie Tudor-1/31/2003
17945I don't know if I've changed my tune. Usually when I mention the directMeDroogies-1/31/2003
17944<i>As for ORCL, I think we could see another dip from here as broader markLizzie Tudor-1/31/2003
17943Hi ehasfjord, siliconinvestor.com Amazing resistance though. -DI still below robert b furman-1/31/2003
17942Agreed on all counts. I believe, as Eric Hoffer once more or less said, that yoMeDroogies-1/31/2003
17941I got out of my position with a very small profit. I don't like the signs whehasfjord-1/31/2003
17940I don't know if this will make any sense, but, To paraphrase: "Those ehasfjord-1/31/2003
17939I think we'll see a bounce in the AM. Don't know what the afternoon wilMeDroogies-1/30/2003
17938One of the most interesting trips I ever took was 2 years ago, to Andalusia. ThMeDroogies-1/30/2003
17937Hi ehasfjord, I'm stuck with indecision right now! (I hate it when it happrobert b furman-1/30/2003
17936Good Point. Up this morning?? Bobrobert b furman-1/30/2003
17935Hell, look at what they did with 4 planes! This is not even close to a hi-tech ehasfjord-1/30/2003
17934Looks like the lemming effect didn't last as long as I thought it would. Iehasfjord-1/29/2003
17933The constant reminder of terrorism and war seems to spread fear in corporate boaQualified Opinion-1/29/2003
17932Actually, I just believe that, like war and the poor, terrorism will always be wMeDroogies-1/29/2003
17931Hi M, I hope you underestimate the international efforts at stopping their finarobert b furman-1/29/2003
17930Here is why I disagree with that statement. Basically, Al-Qaeda is nothing newMeDroogies-1/29/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News