SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Longer-Term Market Trends
An SI Board Since March 2008
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3209 156 3
Emcee:  Fiscally Conservative Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1809You just spoke of closures as if they had happened relatively frequently, so I aPerspective-10/2/2008
1808Dunno B. You're talking about closures to try to stop price fall I presume. AllansAlias-10/2/2008
1807So far I think it's due to the acute problems associated with the new anti-nPerspective-10/2/2008
1806Zero borrows would scare me, is everyone short?Jack of All Trades-10/2/2008
1805It seems that they have banned short selling in every REIT I've looked at. DPerspective-10/2/2008
1804Do you know offhand what market closures have occurred over the past 100 years oPerspective-10/2/2008
1803I noticed your Trendline has gone "POOF". Very Nice Longer Term ChartGalirayo-10/2/2008
1802I agree completely. I am seeing the effects of the bad policies and credit bubbjjstingray210/2/2008
1801Everyday some other thing to blame. It is a little disappointing, but not surpriAllansAlias110/2/2008
1800There has been a lot of talk about the VIX. Does anyone really think this is a jjstingray110/1/2008
1799OT: No doubt. There is a long history of this, as you know patron. We are followAllansAlias110/1/2008
1798Please email your senator and congressman. market-ticker.denninger.netjay7_wallace210/1/2008
1797The next step after banning short selling is to ban ALL selling. i.e, close the patron_anejo_por_favor-10/1/2008
1796indeed. i think that might be a better name for this planNOW-10/1/2008
1795OT: Recommended. I would think the obvious side effect here is capital flight fjmiller099-10/1/2008
1794OT: "mark to estimate"?! LOL. Limits on short selling. The list of inAllansAlias69/30/2008
1793We will definitely see a retest at the very least, if not complete failure. Thejjstingray19/30/2008
1792in the last 3 min bar e-mini futures they bought 115,000 contracts the shorts cJerry Olson-9/30/2008
1791Funny, I was just posting this when you said that. I would actually expect a bijjstingray-9/30/2008
1790How 'bout that - closed *right* at the line! Whodathunkit! So, if we get baPerspective-9/30/2008
1789jj Thanks for your continued posting of this chart. My experience tells me that rcksinc-9/30/2008
1788If you have a moment, you might want to check out Bill Wolfe's site as he shBerk-9/30/2008
1787AA not a problem really...i have been known to be wrong before and will again. Jerry Olson19/30/2008
1786If the wedge breakdown is real, we should get a snapback rally to 1160 to 1170 ojjstingray49/30/2008
1785That's BS. It's OK to call-out a mistake, but not in that sort of way.AllansAlias109/30/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):