SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3143 54 0
Emcee:  CountofMoneyCristo Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1893I am not calling you McCarthy, I am saying that your tactics are reminiscent of Jorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1892After one's been beaten-up the first few times, it should be apparent. &quoJon Tara-7/22/2003
1891Let me repeat that. So, how is one supposed to know when they are entering a &quYogizuna-7/22/2003
1890I don't know all of the facts on the Rea appeal, but it sounds to me like heJorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1889In this case I cannot argue with you, because I, unlike you, will not presume thYogizuna-7/22/2003
1888>>> all that I need is the ability to read the written word. your commeYogizuna-7/22/2003
1887>>> The conclusions and responses he comes up with are far beyond absurYogizuna-7/22/2003
1886And it is also relevant in my opinion, that you be as fair and unbiased as possiYogizuna-7/22/2003
1885Not quite accurate, what you said. I said "on behalf of the defendants.&quoCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1884Typical of what?Jon Tara-7/22/2003
1883The point is you "threatened" to bring Jon Tara into the case. And itJorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1882His "multiply is a term used in trading" was the best laugh I've hJon Tara-7/22/2003
1881Anything further? Why not address the Rea appeal? I asked Jorj. No response, CountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1880In fact, you already thanked me for my help. Paranoid. Jumps to conclusions. DoJon Tara-7/22/2003
1879You're here to help me? Now I have truly heard it all. lolCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1878You're acting just like the defendants. Doesn't make you one of them, bCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1877<i> dredging up faulty old multiply routines... and jumping to conclusionsJorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1876I do not work for anyone either, except "The Boss" (my wife):), and twYogizuna-7/22/2003
1875So, you are not one of the 10,000? You won't be joining the class action? &Jon Tara-7/22/2003
1874I never said that you refuse to provide your motivation. You keep reading what IJon Tara-7/22/2003
1873You're only 45??? Have some respect for your elders son! <ROTFLMAO>Yogizuna-7/22/2003
1872yup, same here. Other than the user interface, the variety of people tied to teJorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1871<i>The veiled threat is that if someone is connected, however remotely, toCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1870I think you may be right, Yogi. As I now recall Count's posts, the state gotJon Tara-7/22/2003
1869In fact, the notion that it might be relevant didn't even cross my mind. OthJon Tara-7/22/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):