SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Internet Analysis - Discussion
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
419 14 0
Emcee:  musea Type:  Unmoderated
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19 HI. Followed your discussion from the AOL thread. I am a DCF analyst too. One Joe E.-2/1/1999
18 larry and all in talking with a friend today the earnings report was brought toSpreck-2/1/1999
17 George, I think you are homing in on the right questions, but I think that poteChuzzlewit-2/1/1999
16 Musea, AOL has two big problems down the road. 1) Speed. ATHM is going to polarry-1/31/1999
15 George, You asked: <i>The article/person you reference is a recent commemusea-1/31/1999
14 musea...The article/person you reference is a recent commentary?...Did it/he saJorge-1/31/1999
13 George, You wrote: <i>Do we know enough about where AOL is going with thmusea-1/31/1999
12 Chuzz...As per your suggestion I'm taking my last post from the other AOL bJorge-1/31/1999
11 I received the following post from Jorge on the AOL thread. I think it is approChuzzlewit-1/31/1999
10 Larry, <i>Remember that I was using a sarcastic voice in saying that Chumusea-1/31/1999
9 Lawrence Kudlow Sun, 31 Jan 1999, 11:28pm EST puborectalis-1/31/1999
8 For those interested in an EVA discussion, consider the following: From thestrChuzzlewit-1/31/1999
7 Musea, Remember that I was using a sarcastic voice in saying that Chuzz was milarry-1/31/1999
6 Chuzzlewit, I'm going to copy part of your post as a convenience to readermusea-1/31/1999
5 Larry, You wrote: <i>You are missing the obvious part, that is, your valmusea-1/31/1999
4 Chuzzlewit, Welcome to the thread. I have to admit to a lot of self-interest musea-1/31/1999
3 CTC, You are missing the obvious part, that is, your valuation model is arguablarry-1/31/1999
2 Musea, first, let me extend my thanks to establishing a forum in which reasonedChuzzlewit-1/31/1999
1 Welcome to this thread. I hope that there will be a lot of good discussion andmusea-1/31/1999
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):