SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CSGI ...READY FOR TAKE-OFF!
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3391 10 0 CSGI
Emcee:  PETE DARRUDA Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1916 <<you would have to call NASDAQ>> I did just that: Message 309659Trader X-1/5/1998
1915 CORRECTION_______________ sorry Kevin, but you are trying to twist your way outech-1/5/1998
1914 CONJECTURE vs. FACTS. tech: <<I am just posting the facts, while you areTrader X-1/5/1998
1913 Tech/Kevin /Angel: I spoke w/ both NASD and Nasdaq today. NASD Market Regulatifeltburner-1/5/1998
1912 --CORRECTION-- In the interest of equality and fair play I felt it nessecary tTrader X-1/5/1998
1911 No gymnastics, I am just posting the facts, while you are posting your conjectutech-1/5/1998
1910 CSGI is off <b>20%</b> from its high which was before I called yourangel-1/5/1998
1909 Investigation or Review? Jump ball! While tech is playing verbal gymnastics wiTrader X-1/5/1998
1908 >> He who laughs last << I agree 100% ..... and we will see who latech-1/5/1998
1907 "while you were busy shooting your mouth off, CSGI just broke over $5.00 aT-Dog-1/5/1998
1906 you were saying? CSGI 1:45PM 4 3/8 -1/4 -5.41% He who LOL last, LOL best.Trader X-1/5/1998
1905 first of all I am not the one who said I called NASDAQ <b>YOU ARE</b&gtech-1/5/1998
1904 Well now Tech isn't that special. The word routine is no longer part of CSGangel-1/5/1998
1903 Humbly report, tech, thanks for your backhanded acknowledgement of the fact thaJosef Svejk-1/5/1998
1902 humbly respond joe, do you want me to look for a post when you were posting atech-1/5/1998
1901 Tech: In its latest filing w/ the SEC, the co. dropped the "routine"feltburner-1/5/1998
1900 Humbly report, tech, this is the third time, that I can remember, you stating tJosef Svejk-1/5/1998
1899 while you were busy shooting your mouth off, CSGI just broke over $5.00 and is tech-1/5/1998
1898 Ha haha! you're a RIOT! I'm sorry, laughter is the only response I caTrader X-1/5/1998
1897 WAIT A MINUTE, SO YOU ADMIT POSTING FALSE INFORMATION ? <i>advised the Ctech-1/5/1998
1896 I'm sorry you missed the post of my positions. tech wrote: <<you takTrader X-1/5/1998
1895 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. ("Trader X-1/5/1998
1894 Is that all you could think of today ? if you look at the reasons I said I hadtech-1/5/1998
1893 tech said <<I did not use the bollinger bands for my analysis, I just posTrader X-1/5/1998
1892 Tech - <i>Is there anyway we can confirm what side of the equation they David Eddy-1/4/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News