SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
5spl
An SI Board Since April 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2534 28 0
Emcee:  LPS5 Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1934Laz, I realize that OJ was not tried under RICO. He was tried for murder in criLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1933OJ wasn't tried under RICO. But, yeah, the standards in the 2 courts are diLazarus_Long-6/23/2005
1932Laz, what may or may not be in the URL in your post is that a person whose propeLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1931Here's some help. www4.law.cornell.edu I'll try to get some of our lawsLazarus_Long-6/23/2005
1930SiouxPal, go read some case law and the actual statute. After this most recent pLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1929That means Laz is full of shit.SiouxPal-6/23/2005
1928SiouxPal, I have no desire to research this any more than I already have. I haveLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1927Prove to me a case where that happened. No innuendos..facts. I told you I'm SiouxPal-6/23/2005
1926Yes, SiouxPal, it does. It does that, and more. - Holly <edit - read the RicLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1925Does RICO really do that? After you've been found not guilty? I don't beSiouxPal-6/23/2005
1924What do you think of a statute that allows the gov't to charge you, take youLazarus_Long-6/23/2005
1923Tim, Okay, I stand corrected. I read in too much haste, as is my habit sometimesLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1922<i> He was among the majority in today's decision re the confiscating TimF-6/23/2005
1921SiouxPal, I am saying both of them had some skin in the game--to gain and to losLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1920SiouxPal, RICO is as unconstitutional as it gets. Please, read the statutes andLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1919So you are saying Anita lied about Thomas's advances?SiouxPal-6/23/2005
1918SiouxPal, Funny, but I didn't. Anita Hill was commanded by the FBI to testiLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1917When RICO works it takes the assets away from the crooks. Their families also suSiouxPal-6/23/2005
1916Tim, He was among the majority in today's decision re the confiscating of prLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1915SiouxPal, for every "Anthony," there are dozens upon dozens who fall uLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1914Me too. Women I believe...believed Hill for the most part.SiouxPal-6/23/2005
1913 I don't know what to make of the whole Anita Hill thing, but as a justice TimF-6/23/2005
1912Do you know of "Anthony"? If you don't this question will not makeSiouxPal-6/23/2005
1911SiouxPal, you should read up on those statutes. They are real bad for anyone whLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
1910Tim, I watched the hearings in their entirety. I do not hold Anita Hill in partLady Lurksalot-6/23/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News