SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit
An SI Board Since June 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3143 54 0
Emcee:  CountofMoneyCristo Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1943think like a jury my dear friend, think like a jury. Or at least like the defensJorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1942Yogi, what, if any, is your association with the Count?Jon Tara-7/22/2003
1941These people are unbelievable Count... I have got to hand it to you for putting Yogizuna-7/22/2003
1940I suspect daddy is already pretty disappointed, and embarassed, if he has InternJon Tara-7/22/2003
1939Actually, that loss I'll prove, but I'm not going to just yet say how I CountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1938>>> So now let's go back to the fact that you were doing exactly whYogizuna-7/22/2003
1937Brain transplant or maybe morality transplant... Don't worry, Yogi, I'mCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1936your going to need those logs to prove your $10M loss. All of those logs. Not jJorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1935>>> The giving of advice for a fee is not illegal. Being wrong is not iYogizuna-7/22/2003
1934You have read my allegations here; you said I did exactly what they did. That&#CountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1933Another problem. Let's see here, what did he say? nytimes.com <i>InCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1932<i>That's a libelous statement, Jorj. </i> I think that you wouJorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1931He's in a corner, Yogi. No telling what he'll say next. He's liablCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1930>>> Seems "you should buy" is a recommendation and "MRVCYogizuna-7/22/2003
1929That took some length of time to occur, so obviously, the effect was not immediaYogizuna-7/22/2003
1928Yes indeed - but that is not in the Complaint yet. It will be, soon.CountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1927Once again, you are comparing "apples and oranges" here... There is nYogizuna-7/22/2003
1926nope, you just ignored the questions...and they are far more relevant than whethJorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1925You might want to review SEC v. Park, before coming to conclusions. Legal preceCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1924yup, good luck trying to assert that one.Jorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1923Now make up your mind. First you try and say they were not recs; then you say mCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1922I'm not going to discuss those logs except to say that if Rea lies under oatCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1921<i>So now let's go back to the fact that you were doing exactly what yCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
1920you avoided the questions <i>were you still trading off of TP's tradiJorj X Mckie-7/22/2003
1919Interesting. I never said your questions were unimportant. The giving of advicCountofMoneyCristo-7/22/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):