SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Orckit (ORCT)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1998 40 0 ORCT
Emcee:  Abraham Pucheril Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1948 Baldone: You could be right. I have seen a lot come and go. I don't think tJohn F. Dowd-10/21/1999
1947 I was in it at 28, sold at 35 (a 25% gain, not bad, but ...) was trying to killBald Man from Mars-10/21/1999
1946 BaldOne: This is one of the few DSL pure plays left that has a real presence inJohn F. Dowd-10/21/1999
1945 this one sucks, it was 40 a week ago ... now down 30% ... Bald Man from Mars-10/21/1999
1944 BaldOne: It appears that many had hoped that INTC was going to their deal with John F. Dowd-10/21/1999
1943 the last 4 days has seen daily range of at least 4 points, reaching 40 on day 1Bald Man from Mars-10/19/1999
1942 sav: When is this outfit going to learn how to construct a bottom line? I rememJohn F. Dowd-10/19/1999
1941 hi sav well, that clears up ONE of the mysteries and adds another twist - niceSteveG-10/18/1999
1940 [orct patent on full rate splitterless?] Hi SteveG, the following appeared insavolainen-10/18/1999
1939 interesting thought Jaakko- Alcatel is apparently getting a lot of pressure frSteveG-10/15/1999
1938 ALA trying to manipulate ORCT price before trying to buy it? :-) And agreeing Jaakko Hyvtti-10/15/1999
1937 hi savolainen- <..doesn't look to me at first glance that this patent wSteveG-10/14/1999
1936 savolainen: This splitterless announcement at Telecom 99 may be new to Geneva SJohn F. Dowd-10/14/1999
1935Message 11551837 <i>"I assure you I read every word you personally tScrapps-10/14/1999
1934 Thanx, but, your mansuetude and charm escapes me.Scrapps-10/14/1999
1933 [lame patent/ cheap shot] Hi SteveG, when you get a chance (and if you'resavolainen-10/14/1999
1932 <..I've heard the G.Lite portion on fast retrain will be applied to the SteveG-10/14/1999
1931 Do you know what ITU standard applies to Full Rate G. Lite? I've heard theScrapps-10/14/1999
1930 I assure you I read every word you personally type.<gg> DMaA-10/14/1999
1929 That is acceptable. :o) Scrapps-10/14/1999
1928 It was so nice I posted it twice. DMaA-10/14/1999
1927 What? You didn't like that press release when I linked to it today? <g&Scrapps-10/14/1999
1926 Yuck. On the brighter side, another ORCT announcement: biz.yahoo.comDMaA-10/14/1999
1925 syndicalism \Syn"dic*al*ism\, n. [F. syndicalisme.] The theory, plan, or Scrapps-10/14/1999
1924 Ever heard of French syndicalism? Don't know what it is but sounds bad.DMaA-10/14/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):