SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting
An SI Board Since June 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
196995 1035 8 QCOM
Emcee:  Silcon Observer Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
195431And your car likely drives better (ie safer) than you too.waitwatchwander1August 27
195430my car has better built in ai than apple phones.....siri is usually late and wroengineer5August 27
195429i used to try to research something on the internet to find alternate ideas and engineer6August 27
195428You can still use Microsoft Co-Pilot on an Iphone which does all those things yofreefromwires3August 27
195427Problem here is that hundreds of millions of Apple users do not know what they aBDAZZ8August 27
195426Rokid Officially Launches Rokid Glasses: The World's Lightest Full-Function Bill Wolf3August 27
195425Apple’s Product Event Next Week Could Highlight AI, New iPhone Apple teased a prBill Wolf5August 27
195424hard to beat basic physics.....good points.engineer1August 27
195423Sorry reply got cut off, more on Intel's specific decision to replace copperWildbiftek6August 26
195422Not unique to Intel fuse.wikichip.org The transistor profile has been enhancedWildbiftek1August 26
195421no idea and who knows. It is slightly is easier to flow into vias, but has alot engineer1August 26
195420Why is Intel pursuing Cobalt but TSMC and Samsung are not, and how much of an adwaitwatchwander1August 26
195419Intc - Govt 10% stake...........................................................Jim Mullens1August 26
195418the issue was they were a year or two late in introducing it. What should have hengineer6August 26
195417Didn't Intel's problem start with the decision to go cobalt for M0/M1 foQurious3August 26
195416i am not going to introduce political stuff into this thread, but the present adengineer11August 26
195415I thought much of Intel's R&D spend was directed towards bringing in thewaitwatchwander2August 26
195414QUALCOMM (QCOM) Appoints New Chief Accounting Officer as Executive Roles Shift Bill Wolf-August 26
195413Qualcomm Launches World’s First Enterprise Mobile Processor with Fully IntegrateBill Wolf1August 26
195412These kinds of changes take years, and Trump will be out of office in three yearElroy1August 26
195411I understood the prior thread, but new facts have been introduced which may or msbfm1August 26
195410i will offer my comments on intel fabs. i think around 7 nm, they got into some engineer6August 26
195409Building a base for the run towards breaking selling resistance in the $170+ ranwaitwatchwander1August 26
195408Seems like 160 is a major resistance number....Optntrdr19991August 26
195407Samsung taking over IFS seems like a reasonable outcome. It's all a matter waitwatchwander1August 26
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):