SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19607<i> It is simply amazing to me that years after it is quite apparent just Lane3-8/22/2002
19606I understand where you are coming from, though I don't recall your post on tOriginal Mad Dog-8/22/2002
19605<i>I supervise people in my work. If I harass them, my company had damn weLane3-8/22/2002
19604Thanks. It is simply amazing to me that years after it is quite apparent just wjlallen-8/22/2002
19603I absolutely disagree. I supervise people in my work. If I harass them, my comOriginal Mad Dog-8/22/2002
19602People are entitled to expect privacy regarding their sex lives. When that privLane3-8/22/2002
19601Nice summary jla. The thing that really was irksome to me was the persistent arOriginal Mad Dog-8/22/2002
19600I found this analysis of the McKinney contest interesting. Impact of McKinney LLane3-8/22/2002
19599My, my, my. I always wondered who was in that place. Lucky dog, you. I stayed atBill-8/22/2002
19598Is that you mad dog?TigerPaw-8/22/2002
19597Your analysis is faulty. Paula Jones brought a lawsuit. She is entitled to dojlallen-8/22/2002
19596We took the house between Nantucket Sound and the Edgartown GC. The only bad thZoltan!-8/22/2002
19595Invite posters to post three best weblogs or more, that have integrity and are utheeleventhmuse-8/22/2002
19594If he figures he can't get Congress' backing, he'd be crazy to go inLazarus_Long-8/22/2002
19593Do you need help finding your way back to the GWB thread?Lazarus_Long-8/22/2002
19592<i>There is no way to interpret Clinton's answers as truthful</i>TigerPaw-8/21/2002
19591There is no way to interpret Clinton's answers as truthful. Even he doesn&#Original Mad Dog-8/21/2002
19590<i>Either the oath means you tell the truth or it means you are free to liTigerPaw-8/21/2002
19589Thanks for not answering the question. Either the oath means you tell the truthOriginal Mad Dog-8/21/2002
19588That's the difference between laws and justice. Most trials involve some diTigerPaw-8/21/2002
19587In this particular case, my distaste at seeing a President lie under oath is balDayuhan-8/21/2002
19586TP, If you are in a lawsuit, and your opponent lies under oath to the jury or tOriginal Mad Dog-8/21/2002
19585No dipshit, lying under oath in a judicial proceeding, even after the BillyBubbajlallen-8/21/2002
19584<i>can face severe penalties</i> Only with anal-retentive prosecuterTigerPaw-8/21/2002
19583Once the die has been cast (as he can do under the War Powers Act, which gives hE-8/21/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News