SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lucent Technologies (LU)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
21876 377 0 LU
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
19726Why don't you just keep posting that article everyday until December that waSabrejet-3/28/2002
19725Yup. TMX880. I've sat through a presentation from Lucent on this box. ActualDavid Hansen-3/28/2002
19724Dave, You also are too quick to respond my friend. Nexabit is alive (well, on tDavid Hansen-3/28/2002
19723Actually they did get something out of Nexabit. One of their recent products hassylvester80-3/28/2002
19722You are right, after paying about $1B for Nexabit, they killed that too. What aDave-3/28/2002
19721Don't bet on telecoms' future by Rene Carayol Thursday 21 February 20elmatador-3/28/2002
19720This came out of CoSine's 10K financial report dated March 2002. WE HAVE David Hansen-3/28/2002
19719sylvester, RE: <i>So my question to you is what would it take you to pulGVTucker-3/28/2002
19718And considering that GV actually said that <i>"Heck, I don't thinsylvester80-3/28/2002
19717Yes yes yes GV! You are right, there is a possibility. But what are the odds? WHDavid Hansen-3/28/2002
19716Just for kicks GV. You have been in this board for a while so something tells mesylvester80-3/28/2002
19715Good luck GV. Let us know when you find one. Or have you found one already?sylvester80-3/28/2002
19714sylvester, RE: <i>And BTW GV, sounds like you are looking to buy a growtGVTucker-3/28/2002
19713Yes, it's a CYA clause. But it wouldn't be on there if there wasn'tGVTucker-3/28/2002
19712And they call that a CYA clause.Sabrejet-3/28/2002
19711That kind of worst scenario language is obviously placed in the report, at the rKenneth E. Phillipps-3/28/2002
19710I actually don't think much of Susan as you couldn't tell that from my psylvester80-3/28/2002
19709If you think anything of Susan's opinion, as it appears you do, then take noGVTucker-3/28/2002
19708At least when you make an error you accept it! Unlike others, they will argue tiSabrejet-3/28/2002
19707I yield! My head was in the classical router, OSPF, ISIS, BGP4 space. The abilAlex Chilton-3/28/2002
19706Alex, You were a little too quick on this one. Go check www.lucent.com. RoutersDavid Hansen-3/28/2002
19705<b>Can you believe it! Susan Kalla at Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co.sylvester80-3/28/2002
19704I don't think that Lucent or Nortel or anyone else for that matter shows up sylvester80-3/28/2002
19703Know your company. LU doesn't make routers. They killed the packetstar wheAlex Chilton-3/28/2002
19702You sound like Juniper and Lucent operate in completely different markets. I disDiB-3/28/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News