Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

An SI Board Since June 2000

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
198141	1047	8	QCOM

Emcee: Silcon Observer	Type: Moderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
197292	Art- re: Arm / QCOM IP..........................................................	Jim Mullens	-	January 20
197291	Last I heard, ARM, no matter which part of ARM we're referring to, has no li	Art Bechhoefer	-	January 20
197290	I find the response interesting - in that it admits one ARM entity contacted qc	Optntrdr1999	7	January 20
197289	Why is it so hard for investors to understand that it's a big tailwind for y	A.J. Mullen	7	January 20
197288	Bill, re: NVDA new N1X – equipped gaming laptops ………………….......................	Jim Mullens	-	January 20
197287	Exclusive: Nvidia targets 2026 launch for Windows on Arm notebook Monica Chen, T	Bill Wolf	1	January 20
197286	Amon at Davos- WSJ Alan Murray video - Positive / respectful interview from Mur	Jim Mullens	4	January 20
197285	<< "He's the right man at the right time?" What are you,	Doug M.	3	January 20
197284	JG- re: QCOM v ARM - ............................................... One of the	Jim Mullens	-	January 20
197283	Thanks... Jim	Silcon Observer	-	January 20
197282	thanks... QHT	Silcon Observer	-	January 20
197281	One of the first questions asked in discovery is usually whether the correct ent	JGoren	2	January 19
197280	Rev---Message #197279 from Jim Mullens at 1/19/2026 7:03:04 PM SO, re; QCOM v	Jim Mullens	2	January 19
197279	SO, re; QCOM v ARM- Motion to consolidate. Add- Opened the link and statement	Jim Mullens	2	January 19
197278	Here is their request to consolidate the two cases: gov.uscourts.ded.85553.595.0	QCOM_HYPE_TRAIN	2	January 19
197277	Thundercomm Brings On-Device AI Agents to Physical World From Smart Home to Act	Jim Mullens	1	January 19
197276	Jim, Thanks for the post. Is there a link to this fact (Arm's claim of QC	Silcon Observer	-	January 19
197275	My thoughts exactly. The Intel turd was swirling in the toilet before free mark	freefromwires	-	January 19
197274	finance.yahoo.com With respect to the memory shortage: Smartphone OEMs are exp	freefromwires	3	January 19
197273	What’s on today [graphic]8 am: CCO Breakfast with Page, Qualcomm, and Stagwell	Bill Wolf	-	January 19
197272	Asus Confirms It Won't Launch Phones In 2026, May Leave Android Altogether	waitwatchwander	1	January 19
197271	<i> Are you implying that Lip-Bu is going to change his stripes after join	Elroy	1	January 18
197270	The special master may have denied it because - he may have viewed this as outsi	Optntrdr1999	2	January 18
197269	Wow Jon! I like your style, you sound so confident about it... I will keep an ey	Damián	-	January 18
197268	OT: What you just posted just shows how far Intel fell upon deciding not to tra	waitwatchwander	3	January 18

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):