SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Glenayre Technologies(GEMS)- a pure cellular PCS play?
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3431 33 0 GEMS
Emcee:  Malladi Prasad Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2156 <<The last part of me, which is usually the "correct" part of mWilliam Douglas-10/17/1997
2155 You are there! 14 3/4's on inflation fears. Good job, JeffJeffrey L. Henken-10/17/1997
2154 Glenayre Technologies Inc. is a worldwide provider of telecommunications infrasJeffrey L. Henken-10/17/1997
2153 Could anybody contribute an opinion re: the competitive threat posed by PCS. D4finger-10/17/1997
2152 << <i> ... enough to make it worth the risk? </i> >> WMachaon-10/17/1997
2151 robert, mu's asp was $6.50 last and their eps was $0.33. now it is... pweSkeeter Bug-10/17/1997
2150 << <i>corrupt mentality of nutburger brained big mo geeks is what cMachaon-10/17/1997
2149 <<I just don't have a great feeling for the valuations of options>William Douglas-10/17/1997
2148 << <i>best put around is mu. jan 32.50s.</i> Thanks, I'lMachaon-10/17/1997
2147 robert, i'm not worried about gems. i'm worried about spurned bulls taSkeeter Bug-10/17/1997
2146 << <i>i may trim down some gems</i> >> Skeets: I donMachaon-10/17/1997
2145 robert, the best put around is mu. jan 32.50s. wait for a bump in price...Skeeter Bug-10/17/1997
2144 robert, where's my money ;-) tech wreck ii may take all techs with it. i Skeeter Bug-10/17/1997
2143 << <i>but I do think you could find a better put candidate.</i&gMachaon-10/16/1997
2142 I think I see where you are coming from. However I don't agree that deflatiJeffrey L. Henken-10/16/1997
2141 Well, I put in an order to "buy" 10 "Nov 15" put options (rMachaon-10/16/1997
2140 << <i>Would you conclude from that figure that more of a downfall iMachaon-10/16/1997
2139 OFF TOPIC: Hi Van I hope you stayed away from ANET and OZON too(when it was ovJeffrey L. Henken-10/16/1997
2138 Ok 50 went in one trade. Volume for the day 55. You paid $500. As I said I'William Douglas-10/16/1997
2137 Out of the 80 stocks or so that I follow only 15 were up today. Would you conclJeffrey L. Henken-10/16/1997
2136 << <i>I conclude you paid Skeeter $100 for each.</i> >>Machaon-10/16/1997
2135 <<I'm not an options expert>> Me either but based on volume toWilliam Douglas-10/16/1997
2134 << <i>If it was it looks like he got a very good price on your 5.&lMachaon-10/16/1997
2133 <<someone has $2500 of Put Buyers money in their pocket, including $500 oWilliam Douglas-10/16/1997
2132 << <i> I like the Nov 12.5 </i> >> So does someone elsMachaon-10/16/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):