SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
A CENTURY OF LIONS/THE 20TH CENTURY TOP 100
An SI Board Since October 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3246 12 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2171 LOL! True enough...... Neocon-12/9/1999
2170 Clinton is always sincere - for the time it takes the words to leave his forkedZoltan!-12/9/1999
2169 Actually, I think he is sincere, in a sentimental sense...... Neocon-12/9/1999
2168 FDR was blind about the magnitude of Stalin's crimes, but you know that ChuNeocon-12/9/1999
2167 >><I>Clinton praises God too. Does that reflect on Him? </i> Zoltan!-12/9/1999
2166 Not being up on the Pearl Harbor scenario, I can't comment one way or the oTom Clarke-12/9/1999
2165 Clinton praises God too. Does that reflect on Him? Neocon-12/9/1999
2164 Legendary liar appreciates same. Another reason to remove FDR from the "gZoltan!-12/9/1999
2163 Well, that is a good restatement of the disputed scenario..... Neocon-12/9/1999
2162 >><I>Further, I have seen solid evidence that FDR was trying to proZoltan!-12/9/1999
2161 I understand that circumstantial evidence is often better than testamentary eviNeocon-12/9/1999
2160 >><I>but there is no solid evidence</i> Wrong. There is pleZoltan!-12/9/1999
2159 My trust in the Clintonoid Administration and justice has just gone UP a thousacody andre-12/9/1999
2158 You are engaged in circular reasoning. Assuming that FDR did what is alleged, tNeocon-12/9/1999
2157 The last paragraph seems to give the appropriate rationale for the continuing rZoltan!-12/9/1999
2156 >><I>We already know the lengths that FDR supporters will go to lieZoltan!-12/9/1999
2155 By the way, I thought you might find this interesting (of course, the posts leaNeocon-12/8/1999
2154 Yes, actually I did, on that post, and was touched. I really do prefer it when Neocon-12/8/1999
2153 Sure, I noticed, Neo. Check out the last line: Message 12217205 You don'jbe-12/8/1999
2152 Joan, I hope that you have noted that I am the only one around who has taken umNeocon-12/8/1999
2151 I am that your pulchritude is in suetude..... Neocon-12/8/1999
2150 Yes! It was Andrei Codrescu. I've been reading a lot of him lately. I'vTom Clarke-12/8/1999
2149 Codrescu, perhaps? Sounds like the kind of thing a displaced Romanian might sajbe-12/8/1999
2148 Aw Joan, I find that hard to believe. Isn't that a wonderful sentence? TheTom Clarke-12/8/1999
2147 Yes. My pulchritude is in desuetude. ;-(( jbe-12/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):