SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Children's Beverage Group (TCBG)
An SI Board Since June 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2452 6 0 TCBG
Emcee:  gambler Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2202 I actually think this is a good buying opportunity, It looks like selling voluDJ Hartsell-12/15/1998
2201 This is my first post on this thread (actually it's my first post on SI)andLt. Columbo-12/13/1998
2200 Well, What do you think, boys and girls? Volume falling and stock price too. IsDue Diligence-12/12/1998
2199 as a matter of interest,i saw today eddie cheever's car 51 and tcbg is cleaCRDO-12/11/1998
2198 Yesterday's interest: 12/11 05:17 Internet Marketing Associates AnnouncesHonor First-12/11/1998
2197 Thanks for the intelligent post. I respect Jon and believe he will do what is bEarl Falwell-12/11/1998
2196 You are right Earl. Jon's common stock is restricted and doesn't becomeMister_Ex-12/11/1998
2195 Restricted preferred shares didn't know there was such a thing cav Cavalry-12/10/1998
2194 Cav, Jon's stock is restricted and is not free trading. The MM's walkeEarl Falwell-12/10/1998
2193 Thanks Mark that sounds more reasonable to me. I will plug in the numbers andDJ Hartsell-12/9/1998
2192 you are on, and sorry about the balls comment! in light of your profession theyCRDO-12/9/1998
2191 How much money did they make this time dumping so much paper they tanked it bacCavalry-12/9/1998
2190 <<I will wager $100 that this stock will hit $2 per share before your tarAC Flyer-12/9/1998
2189 Mark, thanks for your excellent posts. I am not affiliated with TCBG in any wayMister_Ex-12/9/1998
2188 DJ, the $0.16 per pouch is the revenue per pouch. I have been told that the netmark cox-12/9/1998
2187 I am new to TCBG but I agree with you that this is HUGE. The way I see it theDJ Hartsell-12/9/1998
2186 AC, I don't see why you and Cavalry have such a concern for Jon having contmark cox-12/9/1998
2185 no response to my candid reply to your post 2126. sorry to disappoint your accuCRDO-12/8/1998
2184 "...operating potential, but no restrictions on management actions." KSully-12/8/1998
2183 And now, the return trip to 70 cents..... Cavalry is right on this one. Here&AC Flyer-12/8/1998
2182 Someone was kind enough to PM me a link to a newspaper in Illinois that had an mark cox-12/8/1998
2181 Watching what, tcbg going to $5, this one's gone...there were people who weCavalry-12/8/1998
2180 Garry - No flames here just borrowed thoughts. No, I don't believe the prodLemonHead-12/7/1998
2179 Guess some profit-taking,today? Doesn't surprise me, since TCBG has doubledDue Diligence-12/7/1998
2178 Has anybody actually seen the product on the shelf? Hard for me to believe theGoinlong-12/7/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):