SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
24154 37 0 NSCP
Emcee:  stocks1234 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
22454 I think MSFT will lose in court. Then maybe the appeals court reverses, and theCharles Hughes-1/21/1999
22453 Re: Microsoft losing the DOJ case This case is not really about what MSFT has dodd lot-1/21/1999
22452 Charles -- Do you think the courts will surprise us all? Could MSFT actually lGST-1/20/1999
22451 Bearded One, >>I'm sure of that point. My friends at Microsoft spoknommedeguerre-1/20/1999
22450 Microsoft Internal Data Questions Browser's Appeal my.netscape.com <i&Keith Hankin-1/20/1999
22449 <i> I put Red Hat 5.1 on both a desktop and it was quite challenging (andMarcelo Magnasco-1/20/1999
22448 <i> Sure, but you're still missing the point that the mass-market worKeith Hankin-1/20/1999
22447 Boies, Schmalensee Keep Dueling Over Microsoft Business Practices An INTERACTIRusty Johnson-1/20/1999
22446 <i>. I put Red Hat 5.1 on both a desktop and it was quite challenging (anmicromike-1/20/1999
22445 <i>Maybe you're right: they've gotten to the point where theyBearded One-1/20/1999
22444 ><i>This is true for any system. No way around it, since the peripheradamniseedemons-1/20/1999
22443 << It's not as if Bill Gates was on drugs when he approved this, so wCharles Hughes-1/20/1999
22442 Sal, if you are going to keep this reasonable attitude up, I guess I will have Charles Hughes-1/20/1999
22441 <i> On average, Wall Street analysts estimated Microsoft would earn 59 ceReginald Middleton-1/20/1999
22440 I've written a little about ebay. Although it may offend some, its the trutReginald Middleton-1/20/1999
22439 I think Bork says in his book, in response to proponents of traditional oligopoGerald R. Lampton-1/20/1999
22438 ><i>If there was a competing OS with 35% marketshare, with MSFT havingdamniseedemons-1/20/1999
22437 Maybe you're right: they've gotten to the point where they've startGerald R. Lampton-1/20/1999
22436 You make some good points, Reginald. I've thought about these issues myseldamniseedemons-1/20/1999
22435 ><i>That's just because although your enthusiasm for MSFT has beendamniseedemons-1/20/1999
22434 Why 3 companies and not 2? I can see it now... Bill and Steve are captains anddamniseedemons-1/20/1999
22433 FORE and Microsoft ------------------- FORE Systems' ForeRunjach-1/20/1999
22432 Hi! Glad to see you posting again! <i>It's not as if Bill Gates was Bearded One-1/19/1999
22431 <i>Also saw NSCP's bought and paid for mouthpiece Bork chimed in todaGerald R. Lampton-1/19/1999
22430 A big day for MSFT. It is so quiet on this thread. Here goes! <b> ~2B eaXiaoYao-1/19/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):