SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Oncothyreon
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2344 74 0 ONTY
Emcee:  John Curtis Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2269Steve, empirikos is only pointing to an earlier post from me, he just forgot to scaram(o)uche-8/25/2013
2268Some might enjoy a perusal of this sucker....... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov There are thscaram(o)uche-8/24/2013
2267Steve, could you please point Hirogen at I.V. to this manuscript, which I'vescaram(o)uche-8/24/2013
2266 If you are EVER willing to discuss Cox regression and the sCRT results, please Clarksterh-8/23/2013
2265OK, thanks. If you are EVER willing to discuss Cox regression and the sCRT resuscaram(o)uche-8/23/2013
2264Are you accusing Butts et al. of selecting an analysis that would give a false iClarksterh-8/23/2013
2263>> too simple to play with a few knobs until the answer looks "right&scaram(o)uche-8/23/2013
2262Cool, but would you like to discuss the cox regression and the sCRT results, regscaram(o)uche-8/23/2013
2261Cox regression Cox Regression used in a post hoc fashion is absolutely, utterlyClarksterh-8/23/2013
2260youtube.comscaram(o)uche-8/23/2013
2259>> onty is out of favor, not a good place for a newbie << My opinioscaram(o)uche-8/23/2013
2258I read the posts from people who I have noticed contribute something NEW. ... Clarksterh-8/23/2013
2257If there are any statisticians lurking out there who would enjoy actually contriscaram(o)uche-8/23/2013
2256>> does that mean you are really primarily reading only the people you agrscaram(o)uche-8/23/2013
2255I haven't seen it once, much less repeatedly. Well, since you've noted Clarksterh-8/23/2013
2254>> as I have said repeatedly << Ooooooh, ahhhhhh! I haven't sscaram(o)uche-8/23/2013
2253Neither you nor I have had any exposure to any data grooming from either Merck oClarksterh-8/23/2013
2252>> Even if you think the ONTY/Merck management is Data-like in their ratioscaram(o)uche-8/23/2013
2251Don't have a clue what you're talking about. Are you Jake King? I thouscaram(o)uche-8/23/2013
2250Four, not 100. Four, not 40. I'd suggest that if you are going to crib froClarksterh-8/23/2013
2249>> currently in testing of metastatic << Thanks for the tidbits andscaram(o)uche-8/22/2013
2248Yes. The article looks very similar to the postings of those so-called statistbiomachine56-8/22/2013
2247Out today, seems like it was written some time ago? >> It's unclear hscaram(o)uche-8/22/2013
2246FWIW - seekingalpha.comnigel bates-8/22/2013
2245Do you note that the statisticians have stopped talking about 40 cuts through thscaram(o)uche-8/22/2013
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News