SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
42835 221 0
Emcee:  wooden ships Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
22722I doubt what is said in a pissing fight matters to SI Dave. I am sure he is tooKirk ©-7/29/2006
22721Mark Hulbert is officially agnostic regarding market timing, but he acknowledgesshres-7/29/2006
22720"--I also seem to recall you said you bought more shares in the $7.90 rangeKirk ©-7/29/2006
22719<B>I think Hulbert's table that shows Brinker, who doesn't time boKirk ©-7/29/2006
22718Has Brinker used the term "outlier" lately to describe what he claims stockalot-7/29/2006
22717Queen and Dija, if you're thinking of subscribing to SI, it seems to me thatMath Junkie-7/29/2006
22716"<i>So you don't deny claiming Dave was arbitrarily banishing peoMath Junkie-7/29/2006
22715stockalot said "Well Queen ADMITTED the CONNECTION TO Butter at Yahoo."queenleah-7/29/2006
22714Will, I think the term Bob'l Head fits.yaetmo-7/29/2006
22713Queen says: "And you'll be happy to know that I'm also thinking ofstockalot-7/29/2006
22712queen said: <<Well, just for you, I'm thinking of subscribing here. Adijaexyahoo-7/28/2006
22711kirk said: <<He even posted a "Kirk was right" post on the CACSdijaexyahoo-7/28/2006
22710Opps Queenie, you left out YOUR reference to PB (peanut butter) --remember thestockalot-7/28/2006
22709"The point is, they are supposed to be their own financial advisors, and thdijaexyahoo-7/28/2006
22708So you don't deny claiming Dave was arbitrarily banishing people on another stockalot-7/28/2006
22707stockalot said: <i>Well Queen ADMITTED the CONNECTION TO Butter at Yahoo.queenleah-7/28/2006
22706<i>So what do you think Brinker will be up to tommorrow? 1) Ragging on thepigstuff-7/28/2006
22705"<i>Because on Yahoo you claimed that Dave was being arbitrary and kiMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22704Because on Yahoo you claimed that Dave was being arbitrary and kicking off Brinkstockalot-7/28/2006
22703Why are you returning to this subject? Was this not clear enough to you: MessagMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22702Math on another site you hammered me claiming you never took exception to my tastockalot-7/28/2006
22701Math >>> if you have evidence on whether Brinker or Buffet is better afahrenheit451-7/28/2006
22700"<i>Math wants to claim Brinker not timing the bond market is evidencMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22699You are correct Dave that the poster trying to get their nose under the tent wasstockalot-7/28/2006
22698That is TRULY A CLASSIC. Math wants to claim Brinker not timing the bond marketstockalot-7/28/2006
22697My point is that since a buy-and-hold bond investor beat ALL the bond timing serMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22696Well, I don't claim to totally understand your point, math junkie, but I thiHoney_Bee-7/28/2006
22695Math Comparing Brinker, who doesn't time the bond market, to Bond market tifahrenheit451-7/28/2006
22694I think Hulbert's table that shows Brinker, who doesn't time bonds, outpMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22693dijaexyahoo Thanks for pointing out another one of Brinkers mistakes. --Well,fahrenheit451-7/28/2006
22692Thank you. I think that will help all of us when it comes time to let the occasiMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22691Few if any of them have been instigated by much less based on user input.SI Dave-7/28/2006
22690Does anyone have any comment on my analysis of how Hulbert arrived at a bond-timMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22689"<i>That one had good intentions - a return to the topic at hand, unlMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22688I'm just amazed that you think there was only one serial alias poster at theMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22687"<i>But... It seems the easy solution is to not read the long posts aMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22686"<i>So how do you explain the disappearance of Butter at the same timMath Junkie-7/28/2006
22685So what do you think Brinker will be up to tommorrow? 1) Ragging on the "bstockalot-7/28/2006
22684That one had good intentions - a return to the topic at hand, unlike all of the SI Dave-7/28/2006
22683It would appear that SI is on the ball and another alias belonging to a multialistockalot-7/28/2006
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News