SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Labor Ready (LRW)
An SI Board Since October 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
379 3 0 LRW
Emcee:  lukey Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
229 <i>I said it was Vinik last week.</i> And so did I. As a matter oKhris Vogel-6/21/1999
228 Others have done the same? You mean quit? Yeah, that's right... And it&Dr. Seuss-6/21/1999
227 Jim, Sounds like you added to your long at 42. Give it a break. I called thDr. Seuss-6/21/1999
226 Suess Actually you should be looking to cover At $27 - $29 >>> I gotJim Berg-6/21/1999
225 Khris I don't see a problem with major players taking profits. Because VniJim Berg-6/21/1999
224 Suess GEEZ BUD when someone is always negative they are bound to be right eachJim Berg-6/21/1999
223 Khris is right This is not the top... For those of us that have watched and inJim Berg-6/21/1999
222 last year it bottomed at 11 after the split in the winter ,, We are still pre Jim Berg-6/21/1999
221 I got nothing but time... Dr. SeussDr. Seuss-6/21/1999
220 Being a bargain hunter put bid of 1 even on Jul30s puts--last sale at 1.5--willLTK007-6/21/1999
219 Couldn't sleep last night? I said it was Vinik last week. Don't do muDr. Seuss-6/21/1999
218 Jim, as to my suspicions about who was doing the selling - it was Vinik. I'Khris Vogel-6/21/1999
217 Khris, you seem to work the hardest on hyping LRW whenever it is near it'sDr. Seuss-6/20/1999
216 <i>That's your typical response - ignore the facts and spew your venoKhris Vogel-6/20/1999
215 Last year bottomed at 11+, not 27. But that was last year. j lawrence-6/20/1999
214 HO-HUM If you people just realized how desperate you all sound. Does everyone Jim Berg-6/19/1999
213 That's your typical response - ignore the facts and spew your venom. It woj lawrence-6/19/1999
212 I cashed my puts for a couple points on Thursday,but now thinking to re-positioLTK007-6/19/1999
211 Forgive me, j lawrence - I confused you w/ somebody who wanted to talk about thKhris Vogel-6/18/1999
210 Jeez, Chrissy, it has taken a long time for you to show back up on this board. j lawrence-6/18/1999
209 <i>50% staff turnover</i> This must have came from the same sourceKhris Vogel-6/18/1999
208 DR. SEUSS: How about moving over to the KM Board? That's a REAL SHORT for oilbabe-6/18/1999
207 Here comes the volume...dropping from it's artificially high opening. DrDr. Seuss-6/18/1999
206 Just downloaded a chart of LRW...Looks pretty bad. And you're right, I am Dr. Seuss-6/18/1999
205 <i>Has anyone noticed that Vogel just hasn't been trying lately?</Khris Vogel-6/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):