Cable Car Beverage (DRNK) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Cable Car Beverage (DRNK)

An SI Board Since October 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
284	2	0

Emcee: Andrew	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
234	I don't understand your enthusiasm over DRNK's results. Other than any	Dana Merrill	-	7/28/1997
233	In case you hadn't noticed, DRNK issued another sparkling (no pun intended)	Andrew	-	7/28/1997
232	I like their annual report. I like their product. Problem is, I bought DRNK,	Jake's mom	-	7/28/1997
231	Hold unless their earnings and revenue growth falter or you don't like thei	Andrew	-	7/25/1997
230	So now the question is, will DRNK rise as it always has when they announce grea	Jake's mom	-	7/25/1997
229	Triarc's stealing of Cable Car is looking better for Triarc all the time. N	Lance P. Dykhoff	-	7/25/1997
228	Triarc Beverage Group Announces Sale of C&C July 22, 1997 12:56 PM NEW YOR	Lance P. Dykhoff	-	7/23/1997
227	Lloyd, Would you be willing to demand independent appraisal on your shares (se	Anthony L. Califano	-	7/22/1997
226	At this time, I plan I be voting no on somewhere between 60,000 to 80,000 share	lloyd wood	-	7/22/1997
225	Anybody still home??? Any thoughts on what to do now??? Watching and waiting,	Jake's mom	-	7/22/1997
224	So far I have tallied 63,000 no-votes including my own shares. If all of us we	Anthony L. Califano	-	7/12/1997
223	SC 13D can be found at EDGAR: edgar-online.com	Khris Vogel	-	7/12/1997
222	<<I am not certain from the reading of the law that an attorney is necess	Steve Patterson	-	7/10/1997
221	Thanks for the additional info Steve. You are correct - the 7.5% does not appe	Anthony L. Califano	-	7/9/1997
220	Actually there is a revision to this code, dated 1996. (I'm not a lawyer,	Steve Patterson	-	7/9/1997
219	Some more recent developments re: the 7.5% no-vote. I am in the process of doi	Anthony L. Califano	-	7/8/1997
218	This from a fools mouth: fool.yahoo.com Regards Lance	Lance P. Dykhoff	-	7/7/1997
217	To clarify: Mr. Natural is owned by Triarc. However, they are only the New Yor	Steve Patterson	-	7/3/1997
216	<i>But I think this stock's intrinsic value is at least in the $6 to	Khris Vogel	-	7/3/1997
215	I have access to a free web page on AOL, unfortunately I don't know how, no	Anthony L. Califano	-	7/2/1997
214	> Are you sure about this? (Snapple distribution question) > I wasn'	Steve Patterson	-	7/2/1997
213	<i>The deal is subject to a fairness opinion by Paul, Weiss, a major NY l	Khris Vogel	-	6/30/1997
212	I did some further reading and the Section 262 refers to the "General Corp	Anthony L. Califano	-	6/29/1997
211	I noted two interesting things while reading the 8K: 1) The deal is subject to	Anthony L. Califano	-	6/29/1997
210	I did not mean to imply the share price did not matter. What I was getting at	Anthony L. Califano	-	6/29/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):