SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
SABRATEK CORP (SBTK)
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
487 11 0
Emcee:  DD™ Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
237 When you can't respond to the fact that the SBTK case is nothing like the LPeter V-6/29/1999
236 Peter because of the nature of puts,took them out at a 15% loss rather play gamLTK007-6/29/1999
235 Thanks for showing what a wonderful firm Milberg Weiss is, truly a pillar of thmod-6/29/1999
234 Oh, and by the way, Lexecon paid $716,960 to settle the first lawsuit brought aPeter V-6/29/1999
233 <<You have no such proof that Milberg intends to destroy SBTK out of spitmod-6/29/1999
232 If you bothered to read the article I gave you, you would have read that it wasPeter V-6/29/1999
231 So you admit Milberg Weiss tipped off Pluvia in advance about the lawsuit? Yomod-6/29/1999
230 The case was about making false allegations in a lawsuit for the purpose of harmod-6/29/1999
229 <I>And Pluvia was publishing allegations before the lawsuit was public<Kevin Podsiadlik-6/29/1999
228 I said "generally immune." Milberg impermissibly set up Lexecon for Peter V-6/29/1999
227 <<Lawsuit allegations are generally immune from defamation lawsuits.>&mod-6/29/1999
226 <<all he did was parrot the Milberg Weiss lawsuit word for word. Wonder hPeter V-6/29/1999
225 "Prostitutes-they work for one reason only, there own self interest"-Mike-6/29/1999
224 If you believe the prostitutes, I suggest you buy. I know the truth. I also kPluvia-6/29/1999
223 Another review (see below) of the Milberg Weiss/Pluvia allegations that finds tmod-6/28/1999
222 Gawd - put some clothes on, will ya??!?! I'm beta testing the "New SIPeter V-6/28/1999
221 Banc Boston Robbie Stevens Respond To Pluvia... I find it enormously entertainPluvia-6/28/1999
220 Now that BancBostonRobertsonStephens has independently verified that the Milbermod-6/26/1999
219 I am only 25 cents down on my premium on my puts going into tomorrow---as for LTK007-6/26/1999
218 Resorting to insults, when you can't debate the facts, is a sign of a losermod-6/26/1999
217 <<Cendant was due to outright fraud by senior management, not clueLTK007-6/26/1999
216 << Also, in case you didn't realize it, your owning puts is the eLTK007-6/26/1999
215 max, Try to get your facts right. Cendant was due to outright fraud by seniormod-6/26/1999
214 I don't even have a short on the stock mod--just some puts--but I put poinLTK007-6/26/1999
213 Oh yeah, this is really unclear: <i>In our opinion, suggestions that Sabmod-6/26/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):