SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Advanced Micro vs Intel (AMD / INTC)
An SI Board Since March 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2596 38 0 ^SOX
Emcee:  rupert1 Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2446I was offered the opportunity to tour the College of Nanoscale Science an EngineReseller Mike-9/21/2007
2445elmer Whatever you feel comfortable with is ok with me. As our talk dit not getkpf-9/21/2007
2444Klaus I try to stay within my comfort zone. I don't lock horns with people Elmer Phud-9/21/2007
2443Never mind - i'm am not embarrassed at all. Amused would probably be the beskpf-9/21/2007
2442<i>You are still mixing two concepts, wearing left shoe from one pair and Elmer Phud-9/21/2007
2441elmer You are still mixing two concepts, wearing left shoe from one pair and rikpf-9/21/2007
2440Klaus <i>Considering that the DD is really derived from actual yield numbElmer Phud-9/20/2007
2439elmer <i>Considering that the DD is really derived from actual yield numbkpf-9/20/2007
2438Klaus - <i>A die can be defect-free but something out of spec prevents toElmer Phud-9/20/2007
2437<i>Anything that causes yield loss. It should be lumped in with the partickpf-9/20/2007
2436<i>K7 is 5.7% ahead in integer and the P4 is 20% ahead in FP. Nice try.<Elmer Phud-9/20/2007
2435<i>If they get past 3GHz on 65nm, will you concede that they beat Intel agchipguy-9/20/2007
2434<i>As to 180nm, 1733MHz Athlon XPs (180nm Palomino) kicked the crap out ofFJB-9/20/2007
2433Dear Chipguy: We haven't seen how far AMD will take 65nm. If they get pastpgerassi-9/20/2007
2432<i>I know what a defect is, and i know what parametric yield loss is. ThesElmer Phud-9/20/2007
2431I know what a defect is, and i know what parametric yield loss is. These are twokpf-9/20/2007
2430<i>including those that are the result of parametric defects What would tElmer Phud-9/20/2007
2429<i>including those that are the result of parametric defects</i> Whkpf-9/20/2007
2428<i>As i said, the real game is in parametrics.</i> I'm not surpElmer Phud-9/20/2007
2427<i>All i have to add is dd is just the ouverture of yield-plays nowadays. Elmer Phud-9/20/2007
2426<i>Their claim is for mature yield.</i> For such a statement you cankpf-9/20/2007
2425 Mature yield implies some slow down in improvements, but not necessarily and eTimF-9/20/2007
2424Thanks. Tim has already said what is to be said about it. All i have to add iskpf-9/20/2007
2423Tim <i>They say below .5 cm^2, not .5 cm^2, or about .5 cm^2</i> TElmer Phud-9/20/2007
2422 They say below .5 cm^2, not .5 cm^2, or about .5 cm^2 Of course it could meTimF-9/20/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News