SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Discussion Thread
An SI Board Since May 2008
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3816 14 0
Emcee:  one_less Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2491 It means what it says. But to rephrase it in simple terms its basically tTimF-11/6/2008
2490are you not aware of how tax policy alters investment decisions. are you not awc.hinton-11/6/2008
2489 Your reply is pretty incoherent.TimF-11/6/2008
2488 Palin showed a better grasp of the issues than Biden in the debate. Although TimF-11/6/2008
2487then what does the statement you quoted mean?c.hinton-11/6/2008
2486 1 - That wasn't my statement it was a quote. 2 - More importantly - ThaTimF-11/6/2008
2485Tim i would expect that much...but i guess you dont. and its not so much a failc.hinton-11/6/2008
2484LO!L try again tim....where do people keep their wealth?... The markets!c.hinton-11/6/2008
2483re palin ..please cite one public appearance other than saturday night live wherc.hinton-11/6/2008
2482here is your statement..."re. "Eisenhower and Reagan worked because thc.hinton-11/6/2008
2481 "Careless with other peoples money" argues against your case. RegulTimF-11/6/2008
2480re.careless with other peoples money........excellent observation! and i rest mc.hinton-11/6/2008
2479 The tax tables show no such thing. They showed top marginal rates, not actualTimF-11/6/2008
2478 If your talking about Korea 90% tax rates are counterproductive even from tTimF-11/6/2008
2477 He provides explanation and argument, not much, but you wouldn't expect muTimF-11/6/2008
2476tim ,the point is that you seem to be living in republican la la land...... youc.hinton-11/6/2008
2475 The risk models where indeed applied poorly. But applying them through the reTimF-11/6/2008
2474 Very few people earned over $100k dollars in 1954. Dollars where worth more, TimF-11/6/2008
2473<I> What if the problem is multiples of the entire World GDP? </i> TimF-11/6/2008
2472 Raising taxes would have been very unlikely to have had much of a positive effTimF-11/6/2008
2471tim ,here is a link to historicle tax table... look at 1954 for example..... c.hinton-11/6/2008
2470tim ..you want a war you have to pay for it.. "Tax cuts following the war c.hinton-11/6/2008
2469Tim. he provides no evidence...no explanation ....no nothing ...only unsupportedc.hinton-11/6/2008
2468Very sad story. Smeltzer shouldn't be allowed to operate in civilized communone_less111/6/2008
2467<I> Tim look at the top tax rates during the 50s under eisenhower...90 pluTimF-11/6/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News