SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
LSI Corporation
An SI Board Since October 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
25814 176 0 LSI
Emcee:  Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
25089Hi Eric, That's a good one! It did bring laughter to me. Thanks! With youuu-7/17/2002
25088Hi Addi - These new "financial" definitions recently appeared on the IE_K_S-7/16/2002
25087For a good luagh I think everyone should read this week's Barron's! Baruu-7/14/2002
25086Anybody focusing on earnings and p/e ratios was not buying in late 1999 or earlyAndy M.-7/12/2002
25085And so did numerous folks who bought stocks in March 2000. Almost nobody thoughsea_biscuit-7/12/2002
25084Call me crazy, but I always invest in individual stocks based on my sense of wheAndy M.-7/12/2002
25083Wow! LSI up over 3%. Must be the beginning of a new bull-market! ;-) (Everysea_biscuit-7/12/2002
25082Andy, That only makes it worse. At least if you had made that assumption, itsea_biscuit-7/12/2002
25081Dipy, Where/when have I made this assumption?: >>>On the contrary, itAndy M.-7/12/2002
25080I am not making any assumptions. I am just looking at valuations based on earnisea_biscuit-7/12/2002
25079Then what exactly is your argument, Dipy? That stocks will go down because theyAndy M.-7/12/2002
25078Andy: Yes, using historical arguments is incorrect, because most of the returnssea_biscuit-7/12/2002
25077Dipy, Can you give some examples of how buying at five year lows in the seventiAndy M.-7/12/2002
25076Dipy, Believe it or not I agree with you totally (for once)! I have no problemuu-7/11/2002
25075Hate to be the harbinger of bad news, but... <i>Analyst Fred Hickey calcusea_biscuit-7/11/2002
25074Addi, As a counter-question, I found this somewhere: How many times in your adsea_biscuit-7/11/2002
25073There were a number of occasions during the 70's when you could buy stocks asea_biscuit-7/11/2002
25072You never read any intelligent logical comments on message boards, however someouu-7/11/2002
25071akmike, While I understand the reason for your outburst, the written record thasea_biscuit-7/10/2002
25070Hello Dipy, **Even if the cyclical bear ends and is followed by a cyclical bullakmike-7/10/2002
25069Addi, It is not really the "people" that are following the upgrades lsea_biscuit-7/10/2002
25068ML has been very aggressive in downgrading FO and semi groups etc. Looks like thSultan-7/10/2002
25067It continues to amaze me beyond any words can express. Merril Lynch came out thiuu-7/10/2002
25066I would agree, they could lose a lot of money for all sorts of reasons, but as iRobert Salasidis-7/9/2002
25065Robert, there is always the issue of vendor financing. You never know what willsea_biscuit-7/9/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News