SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
OAKLEY- NYSE:OO
An SI Board Since October 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1383 7 0 OO
Emcee:  stockvalinvestor Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
258 Steve, I agree. I called Oakley last week and told Rene in IR that as a sharehSam Nizam-3/16/1997
257 Yeah but 50 pairs...come on is this a joke or what. Get the stores enough for IN_GOD_I_TRUST-3/15/1997
256 Mine was 11.55 - 12.5125, but that was based on mine own situation. As far as IN_GOD_I_TRUST-3/15/1997
255 BRIAN some news: Oakley signs definitive agreement with Essilor aROCK-3/13/1997
254 Unfortunately, I don't think so. Phil Knight seems to do everything in hoBrian Malloy-3/12/1997
253 If NKE bought OO we'd all be sitting pretty. Do you think it's a possigrogger-3/12/1997
252 KENT, Wash., March 11 (Reuter) - Gargoyles Performance Eyewear said Tuesday Brian C. Lund-3/12/1997
251 That would have been highway robbery if he did! 50 pairs is not what I call a IN_GOD_I_TRUST-3/12/1997
250 Maria thanks for the information!!!!!ROCK-3/12/1997
249 To All: "Irvine, Calif.-Based Oakley Lays Off 'Fewer Than' 200 EmMs. Baby Boomer-3/12/1997
248 Scaling back on employees can be both postitive and negative for a company. Itrainman-3/12/1997
247 BRIAN I have not seen any change in the price of OO maybe this story has not hiROCK-3/12/1997
246 Front page of Los Angeles Times Business Section.... ***Oakley lays off more tBrian C. Lund-3/12/1997
245 According to Zack's.....4/22/97.alan zee-3/12/1997
244 Harkenman or anyone, Does anyone know the aprox. date of the next earnings repJames E. Orbison-3/11/1997
243 HARKENMAN you made some good points I also believe that the shorts will definitROCK-3/10/1997
242 Stock is a bargain at current prices. Oversold and too much short selling baseharkenman-3/9/1997
241 CORRECTION Insider trading of $1,161,000 by J. Jannard/CB from 1/20/97 to 1/31/harkenman-3/9/1997
240 Insider trading (buy) valued at over $900,000 for January 1997, reported by Bharkenman-3/9/1997
239 Sam, I got the 24 pairs number from a post on AOL. I also confirmed it with aSam Nizam-3/8/1997
238 Brian: I'll let you have one guess as to whether I can read or not. PleasSam-3/7/1997
237 "AS for getting out 10 and buying back in under 9, that's 10%." alan zee-3/7/1997
236 Got that info from a Sunglass Hut International CSR (take it for what it's Ms. Baby Boomer-3/6/1997
235 This is why you need an insider to trade successfully. You need accurate news,IN_GOD_I_TRUST-3/6/1997
234 So am I. However, when is see a company loaded with potential thats waiting toIN_GOD_I_TRUST-3/6/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News