SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Y2k Denial on SI
An SI Board Since June 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
151 3 0
Emcee:  John Mansfield Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
26 [JOURNALISM] The Boston Globe : I plead guilty to journalistic incompetence'John Mansfield-6/28/1998
25 John - That's a classic! Definitely a keeper! Surprising that such a briMighty_Mezz-6/28/1998
24 Babb on Y2k 'Paddy, power companies are, and have been, testing for y2k prJohn Mansfield-6/27/1998
23 Walter High on Y2k '....We have been handling cards with expiration dates John Mansfield-6/22/1998
22 "one thing is sure: the real or imagined consequences of the Year 2000 comIceberg-6/22/1998
21 It's a potential chicken & egg problem. Power companies need power to pKurt N-6/22/1998
20 That's right. The fact that GM has dedicated so much money to Y2K should tMike Milde-6/22/1998
19 Hmmmm... I don't support major GLOOM and DOOM regarding Y2K, but if computMike Milde-6/22/1998
18 >>It is disturbing to me that Y2K is getting hyped as "DOOM and GLOOKurt N-6/22/1998
17 Tokyo, what, no ZITL in your portfolio? I am of the belief that the major probRoger A. Babb-6/22/1998
16 I agree, Example: FPL - Florida Power & Light has no idea how many imbeddStormin Norman-6/21/1998
15 I am amazed ,,, that people still do not think ,, y2k will be nightmare for majTokyoMex-6/21/1998
14 Thanks for the post BO BOB, While I'm skeptical of the first part of the aStarfish*-6/21/1998
13 Martin Armstrong, one of the world's greatest economists, on Y2K: pei-intBo Bob Brain-6/21/1998
12 John: You have created a good forum for an exchange of ideas regarding the impJames Strauss-6/21/1998
11 Starfish*, here is some additional info on Y2k and shipping! 'LONDON--WorlJohn Mansfield-6/21/1998
10 Thanks Starfish* for your comments! Some comments on your argumention follow hJohn Mansfield-6/21/1998
9 Ok It is Starfish* at the podium.... It is disturbing to me that Y2K is gettiStarfish*-6/21/1998
8 anyone, on that point we can definitely agree! <eom> Ice Iceberg-6/21/1998
7 anyone, then the press is generally not on-target? <eom> Ice Iceberg-6/21/1998
6 John, the interesting thing to me is that there is no historical precedent for Iceberg-6/21/1998
5 Sire on Y2k Sire is not denying effects of Y2k. But he is very sceptical. ___John Mansfield-6/21/1998
4 consider this........ as aggassi said "perception is everything" so terracin-6/21/1998
3 Bill Wexler on Y2k Bill has his own thread: '2000 Date-Change Problem: ScaJohn Mansfield-6/21/1998
2 Joe Copia on Y2k Message 4951372John Mansfield-6/21/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):