SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Barrick Gold (ABX)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3558 49 0 ABX
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2633So Barrick's value added is due to the fact that they hope they can accuratenickel61-5/11/2002
2632Enigma, you are a piece of work.nickel61-5/11/2002
2631<i>I do think that Barrick might have had a few things in common with the Enigma-5/11/2002
2630You are right I am freaked.nickel61-5/11/2002
2629"You have linked Barrick to everything from Enron to defunct hedgefunds andnickel61-5/11/2002
2628You can always use Excel Viewer if you do not have Excel office.microsoft.comgoldsheet-5/11/2002
2627<b>Rising gold is not the only factor, hedges made much more sense 3 yearsrusset-5/10/2002
2626Bob,... How dare you show this thread that silver production from these mines lrusset-5/10/2002
2625Rising gold is not the only factor, hedges made much more sense 3 years ago whengoldsheet-5/10/2002
2624> about Eskay Creek Produced 16.3moz of silver in trailing 12 months, makingoldsheet-5/10/2002
2623Got to love Bob's chart in color,...added K After today Nem and K must triprusset-5/10/2002
2622He claims to have owned a mutual fund company but he can't read financial stEnigma-5/10/2002
2621Read Barrick's financial statements,...it's all there,...believe it or nrusset-5/10/2002
2620<b>Barrick did not want to reduce its hedges. Some of their bullion bankerrusset-5/10/2002
2619I liked Arp,...I liked it when Homestake bought Arp. I was not in Homestake wherusset-5/10/2002
2618Going way back, Homestake may have originally paid too much for Argentina Gold (goldsheet-5/10/2002
2617What is your view of the Homestake acquisition now? Were you in favor of it wheposthumousone-5/10/2002
2616This is undoubtable true..I agree with you completely..over fifteen years of a bnickel61-5/10/2002
2615"evil intentions" "unpaid GATA supporter" one of us is loosinickel61-5/10/2002
2614Barrick did not want to reduce its hedges. Some of their bullion bankers are getnickel61-5/10/2002
2613At least Tyke is initiating a dialogue - where he loses it is (inter alia!!) wheEnigma-5/10/2002
2612Actually I know exactly how Barrick thinks,...because I read their financial starusset-5/10/2002
2611Leave it , russett. When it comes to options, you don't know what you'rtyc:>-5/10/2002
2610I'm afraid you have completely baffled me with your option lesson. If Barrirusset-5/10/2002
2609Here is an extract from my first posting; "... we find that Barrick has betyc:>-5/10/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News